Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp1093496ybi; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:27:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2I1NXi7ndhg2OzveZLYZTkXArl070PBwGeilwHbSjEw+Ht6Ha7KvDrkHaEDG+5xaLcnou X-Received: by 2002:a65:484d:: with SMTP id i13mr4867250pgs.318.1559240870135; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:27:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559240870; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mMjKVLo+nwHMeyaurjFbzczmtkb7dGGVnhXXvWGBe6T7lsc8DoZejHcK4hH30bedeN ZxTJP5piTolvKaLwUR1mkzBVPPEzqVQjbDZEOisW1wqrgx3HlBNSvdqTYCYehEYTyRpD vwJGfAZCO/E+beHutRjC/KCSe/AoMesQblTMATS3hxrkYp+uCxxMyaRNfgYj3VmShUGS rFaBOai0TlDkIfa5acAszj0ROC7xeoA0MXQNWJatGySV7Amxgot+3S4AWKWB6kUJIhtt 5k+mmxDCTWzM1YQVF8sLwU4bUiwg3XmO2OVYtM2qy3KyYQyLSmnm+Lfy1XDRP00VYjAF jH1A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=M/Hgrx3gxPAJVMSbtDylJ/+wpbSg+exweEjHvBOyfaY=; b=Se90mE7CitMGQAqlKriVQEJJPkWrvNuEESHCn/Vp83G8TYiWwRbUcLT8cIrFuRkCN5 EUeg7Y78XZa/T1t2baBdNE9dRpUeAqU/mU/t27tzp4nZvbhpKY4YBH31De7QXrPV5bUr c4ehROFeIUJz1okPHw0Vrq8j9v5EQRpuglP95o1A75+TVzfzRveeXRqNZp4odOB4AqJ/ iDZXftH9i27Ap29KM/1XUkBrAWqGKicCyaN/M/Kqdvcv79XZtBWnfS5qXyIDzkE6PEVU ZFT5cvwGTCADjo2t+9rGDwxkP4wPW8b7nKrye/HXgkKrwmoUhKggl9lNVZWax7VI/Ty/ lfCQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c83si3898528pfc.246.2019.05.30.11.27.34; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:27:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726682AbfE3S02 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 May 2019 14:26:28 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:32937 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726330AbfE3S00 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2019 14:26:26 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 May 2019 11:26:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.228.129.69]) ([10.228.129.69]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 May 2019 11:26:23 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] IB/rdmavt: Use struct_size() helper To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Mike Marciniszyn , Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190529151248.GA24080@embeddedor> From: Dennis Dalessandro Message-ID: <09563aec-f6d0-f27f-4f67-1e21cebd997c@intel.com> Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 14:26:22 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190529151248.GA24080@embeddedor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/29/2019 11:12 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version > in order to avoid any potential type mistakes, in particular in the > context in which this code is being used. > > So, replace the following form: > > sizeof(struct rvt_sge) * init_attr->cap.max_send_sge + sizeof(struct rvt_swqe) > > with: > > struct_size(swq, sg_list, init_attr->cap.max_send_sge) > > and so on... > > Also, notice that variable size is unnecessary, hence it is removed. > > This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > --- > drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c > index 31a2e65e4906..a60f5faea198 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c > @@ -988,9 +988,7 @@ struct ib_qp *rvt_create_qp(struct ib_pd *ibpd, > case IB_QPT_UC: > case IB_QPT_RC: > case IB_QPT_UD: > - sz = sizeof(struct rvt_sge) * > - init_attr->cap.max_send_sge + > - sizeof(struct rvt_swqe); > + sz = struct_size(swq, sg_list, init_attr->cap.max_send_sge); > swq = vzalloc_node(array_size(sz, sqsize), rdi->dparms.node); > if (!swq) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > Looks correct, I don't think this makes the code easier to read though. The macro name "struct_size" is misleading to me. Maybe that's just me, and in any case... Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro