Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp1321396ybi; Thu, 30 May 2019 15:36:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwdYzjbg/vTMfinBhOL8wk3vWq2zAONV5Z/V7dTbqfrF20Prk2xmL1ym1H57tA7nPMZPe3c X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8598:: with SMTP id w24mr5872653pfn.160.1559255804485; Thu, 30 May 2019 15:36:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559255804; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GrFPE4vQwK8ql9dXcj6vcAi42cbKMH5Riq7ni6KSNJRBjYfkLvtNxnBtElN3SekxNS i3VVFAKliPXOSHA72QKZevOQ/pClEhhfltWiDn6h1/CU0C5Kz5WrqDj2qAJmsYZVuvBb pK+95wu94XShJV4pmWBh49cGSCGlBq3UG2ydbJqjvBxl1rABJRsRznHtcLyBzdM5ajgO gi2Xt7/NkchKwVPNPp0RVXH8u8AX0sH6gdXG0rPlbH1Mk3JjBMsDtpo2/jYDVwBouSCj U6mUPn1h8OrTkUXJXa7YE3uIyzGdzhIG8QP0avh4fFsBjQL+eI2eo7rWZOkaBLi2v0J8 j5XQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=dX8WKZ9qrWHo5nxihC0jGW8Sb1EefXDVfC2HVTjTW0U=; b=vt24nSlIYsSgOe8Qx+kZXeLQQbOl7sSpCZrGD5ZvIXr4jAkGMyOHcyqSqIg2GEIokc Q86nQ51zZKe0EmCseaFvspr7ufenTugwycsipZyp2IMEfhB+yVei7C5EXNLNKR9Yaqwk zEhyRZTq+Wl5dUm6cOJv/4LfCa1zppN/u4skdsDcbThUyHrvdcizS283FwMQvMyvgBIp g1G+8R+2uQVWonsPDQMSgLnF7XycFC9Jn0I2hXpT7fc4WkdUTykN9PKPnpeseZELcDrx Zrrhrj1bqRqbPQrUUOyRhfHUVIUv8S7oOTyxanJyJp8Jd1FTjt1By0qfP9ckEWLvMyPA QPbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=SHqwW19z; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 65si4069659plb.39.2019.05.30.15.36.28; Thu, 30 May 2019 15:36:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=SHqwW19z; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726652AbfE3WeX (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 May 2019 18:34:23 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com ([209.85.160.195]:42159 "EHLO mail-qt1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726045AbfE3WeX (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2019 18:34:23 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id s15so9036970qtk.9; Thu, 30 May 2019 15:34:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dX8WKZ9qrWHo5nxihC0jGW8Sb1EefXDVfC2HVTjTW0U=; b=SHqwW19zaTXztrJeZskOeIDsvYpDUNgAyfzDHK+7CwSuJ/UY2vvMulHl3fn3EPiwKp 7dKcSWfYL+Q3/J5scsAXqmDM93STQJCcctjaf+s7HkYdnWxeY4IOiufkNdk8pufPU0pj GhFes5XTPJLMDHW+THbGMSg8EmhmiYBNj0buWdRMkcs7B2pPSWWIzRlxtrj9EbpXMpqm T/VOdM5GzRAnyKCZmB0mQ86cnoV3h2WF3fPP29KhYS5ojCjCyIL9rq8qPU/93eYdIMY0 x81ZlfNy4Cd1zUGsYKKuU2JtB3Z+xL3smYWMothHCdscWTLrYojSJEBTU3RFPTlEcGYr S/OA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dX8WKZ9qrWHo5nxihC0jGW8Sb1EefXDVfC2HVTjTW0U=; b=YVEbwD8LVkmLiuNvLhn38ZDFn46ES1nnrrn/hzzkhvJNIy9UJa8M3ZTLMZRDCGJoew NPcHqqzcCd4wmZMDdWWt5m7xePORLkfgjKvg2R8sTHyzlMpbm9FZBM69qBx06ktZzon9 OhrstqwIX6Ylg/tszWleYNDt/R21ZusNBC8f9YClQO5WJDCBMwScTIE2oTZfjonfdJcj 2vKGYivDUONsgg7bwR+K+HcdNR3YKQbeeeO4gXAut0oYQuV57Jwe7K9B6ETRZkGb6eMi DisEBSQCEfIvH0aCKpoGh2IUPZK0yTg742eAk/nG4XA/G7VRoyNxQA8ddjPWBeDl+aOl oqhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU9LTHEGxOXaTU8Q0h7vjz3j61nxu/NqDIpy7oDtj5UGazAjDQg A+ehMCo0Jt1jPxWJ+UoGlrI/kmq9LD1dEfYH49o= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b032:: with SMTP id k47mr5801528qvc.86.1559255662262; Thu, 30 May 2019 15:34:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190530190800.7633-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Luke Nelson Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 15:34:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf, riscv: fix bugs in JIT for 32-bit ALU operations To: Song Liu Cc: Xi Wang , =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Networking , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, bpf , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 1:53 PM Song Liu wrote: > > This is a little messy. How about we introduce some helper function > like: > > /* please find a better name... */ > emit_32_or_64(bool is64, const u32 insn_32, const u32 inst_64, struct > rv_jit_context *ctx) > { > if (is64) > emit(insn_64, ctx); > else { > emit(insn_32, ctx); > rd = xxxx; > emit_zext_32(rd, ctx); > } > } This same check is used throughout the file, maybe clean it up in a separate patch?