Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 10:52:10 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
To:     kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        teheo@suse.de, sre@kernel.org
Subject: devm_* vs. PROBE_DEFFER: memory leaks?
Message-ID: <20190531085209.GA20964@amd>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

Is devm_ supposed to work with EPROBE_DEFFER?

Probe function is now called multiple times; is memory freed between
calling probe()? Will allocations from failed probe()s remain after
the driver is inserted successfully, leaking memory?

Thanks,
									Pavel
--=20
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlzw6zkACgkQMOfwapXb+vL0igCeJvVsNfBl8H8xvikYrAeaSVJm
t2oAn360LyefEazCKa/r0oLjLL+fhRNn
=dPKe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--