Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932434AbVKQRDL (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:03:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932429AbVKQRDK (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:03:10 -0500 Received: from digitalimplant.org ([64.62.235.95]:51623 "HELO digitalimplant.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932434AbVKQRDJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:03:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:03:05 -0800 (PST) From: Patrick Mochel X-X-Sender: mochel@monsoon.he.net To: Greg KH cc: Olivier Galibert , kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp In-Reply-To: <20051117164451.GA27178@kroah.com> Message-ID: References: <20051116191051.GG2193@spitz.ucw.cz> <20051117165437.GA10402@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20051117164451.GA27178@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1022 Lines: 30 On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 05:54:37PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:10:52PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > What unstable implementation? swsusp had very little regressions over past > > > year or so. Drivers were different story, but nothing changes w.r.t. drivers. > > > > Do you mean swsusp is actually supposed to work? Suspend-to-ram, > > suspend-to-disk or both? > > Both. -to-ram depends on your video chip, but to-disk should work just > fine. If not, please report bugs. swsusp has nothing to do with suspend-to-ram. swsusp is a platform-independent implementation of suspend-to-disk. STR is very-platform dependent. Please see the file: Documentation/power/states.txt for more info. Pat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/