Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp709508ybi; Fri, 31 May 2019 07:50:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzWNrbspxBQr3TGSISrzj/Hht/XE3PC+pyXCN+QspJW02+TaWtsDpe7jQ5H54RDqdhcDzNj X-Received: by 2002:a65:430a:: with SMTP id j10mr9582867pgq.133.1559314228914; Fri, 31 May 2019 07:50:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559314228; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WzBZXMb2s8kozkmUjnh8uBIxMEvi1uwIsm+RehzbPPwfuA7rcyvda8asO19jc5TeQs yJpP0Yp+Wf9eDSpbRNltP2rDvwQpAoetuI6cFtmOVBNA/CakQndJ7KsJWDHVZgmBZFe2 HXogka0D5XqPHCTx3YBDfaWcznFRtABQTl2JlicXmZTrDAaly0zvadstpX+ngHODT6Oq Y7JV9cbp5hKRxSKyVmBOdKE/e+TPJMtN26fUAJbiWmmRIrdSkiCyaGdJgtZ/XAKrHlfW mcaBMdZKoOGleDIAlIEuZsuaQHyNN9zXj7k864Nccv3Z6Dp0LMSR+PVV6QOhtlFT4ioF IWtA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=/Z5bSUHwSp4kpRmBsObia1lPUPGkJpwlRslF3MX8yr4=; b=KvDeDJCTOatVeKtvBwcf5pYjmLD17Db8US17a2HLv4NU13KCXk8MulE6iiI/Eu0Rtw F8GLQCP2Z+PQQqsvkrL+bBbX6Q6c+ONtmHsDTW5nTBFXDXK/AL0BczSlBtBKlF6Nib/2 mRxcAZR/8eXfaSTo8P7acju9frURf+L1dzoYC89qcz98UqrMMx7EfwVI+gNw95XELTAx ZUxoiAnNrrZD2Ql/NDBmDGOvbZFgajJ/Ffyy1xN10jFcLzWQ7P9RT4EohupReFKjGIY4 LczIVzZZmowzi3w2SNctDdjqVTphYWwxoo4zzVHkknLpX7xIcD8qXkEHObn5wWg5V0qe Vu+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=dstu5uV6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r11si6478670plo.360.2019.05.31.07.50.13; Fri, 31 May 2019 07:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=dstu5uV6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726874AbfEaOs7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 31 May 2019 10:48:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:40741 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726616AbfEaOs7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 May 2019 10:48:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id u17so6349319pfn.7 for ; Fri, 31 May 2019 07:48:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Z5bSUHwSp4kpRmBsObia1lPUPGkJpwlRslF3MX8yr4=; b=dstu5uV6I8AZe1524Xs0LsRfPvVcQuuv2QrR+O6sWM+CesRTgkjlrgYji8Ex3/oTlQ I5Hbtxk91nrpksAsXjsYs5ldKMmfxdd2GI3Fo7AzkVj/Z6uN+CbGN4XJxqjaciRJLfwk YQbMnw02uYLEkHOUcjgJYHojn7/LBppxV9nq10ta/kF5QQnRkdoTmngZFdeHrxDJAJJW ZzGoJD+4B8fUJ9BHDUSMskIHWlgySUg2ma5SWe9QNt+3mWfzT9rZwYPNP6Vmb4zUIlv3 GJkyqJZtS58jDZSsAsN5XjxjsldHj92SYzQKBIyLhnymsmQZrGXsXwspCkGPXVVeUB/p /7Cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Z5bSUHwSp4kpRmBsObia1lPUPGkJpwlRslF3MX8yr4=; b=CMcXjsNugadz48C3CnV5jPIN8Cgy/LFRarTgacr3fA6dlD/xf8h4CltrZk58fU252n yBSJCU9L/ySObu4Sc2iz1dJbgU0RTY3iQLfu0aeKyB77KngAo3okVfizpPc6/tHmjbnY AUMNFkMDo7FwgvO4nivwc1Fl+vWuklz2DOqqlLuQ8OC+D9TSvYCoFugA4LBtINi0OYgO 6pTiaxl//PPWYhUH6MdzB+yHAK//bpPkH7g5+1vvQab3ecLA815+3NexXjIZbQgB+nbm DgdMDEPF1xs+J4dfoujEtkLiteGYvx0aW96p/sH1JRAcS3ri7TzKAaaszU2eHFhQ1FG/ Ox4A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWzJObyHqk7QXTzPJZjdWZCm4gGPo/l0dz7BdiwqcLyiPEZ+o7f Ju08DRPfYLg1x7N8RRI9xlL9E1oG+Xwytg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:cc4b:: with SMTP id q11mr9747244pgi.43.1559314137820; Fri, 31 May 2019 07:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.158] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k2sm5746164pjl.23.2019.05.31.07.48.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 May 2019 07:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] epoll: support pollable epoll from userspace To: Roman Penyaev Cc: Azat Khuzhin , Andrew Morton , Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190516085810.31077-1-rpenyaev@suse.de> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 08:48:55 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190516085810.31077-1-rpenyaev@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/16/19 2:57 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote: > Hi all, > > This is v3 which introduces pollable epoll from userspace. > > v3: > - Measurements made, represented below. > > - Fix alignment for epoll_uitem structure on all 64-bit archs except > x86-64. epoll_uitem should be always 16 bit, proper BUILD_BUG_ON > is added. (Linus) > > - Check pollflags explicitly on 0 inside work callback, and do nothing > if 0. > > v2: > - No reallocations, the max number of items (thus size of the user ring) > is specified by the caller. > > - Interface is simplified: -ENOSPC is returned on attempt to add a new > epoll item if number is reached the max, nothing more. > > - Alloced pages are accounted using user->locked_vm and limited to > RLIMIT_MEMLOCK value. > > - EPOLLONESHOT is handled. > > This series introduces pollable epoll from userspace, i.e. user creates > epfd with a new EPOLL_USERPOLL flag, mmaps epoll descriptor, gets header > and ring pointers and then consumes ready events from a ring, avoiding > epoll_wait() call. When ring is empty, user has to call epoll_wait() > in order to wait for new events. epoll_wait() returns -ESTALE if user > ring has events in the ring (kind of indication, that user has to consume > events from the user ring first, I could not invent anything better than > returning -ESTALE). > > For user header and user ring allocation I used vmalloc_user(). I found > that it is much easy to reuse remap_vmalloc_range_partial() instead of > dealing with page cache (like aio.c does). What is also nice is that > virtual address is properly aligned on SHMLBA, thus there should not be > any d-cache aliasing problems on archs with vivt or vipt caches. Why aren't we just adding support to io_uring for this instead? Then we don't need yet another entirely new ring, that's is just a little different from what we have. I haven't looked into the details of your implementation, just curious if there's anything that makes using io_uring a non-starter for this purpose? -- Jens Axboe