Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750853AbVKRBxy (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:53:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750970AbVKRBxy (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:53:54 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:10639 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853AbVKRBxx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:53:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:50:15 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386 Message-Id: <20051117175015.6aa99fcf.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20051118014055.GK11494@stusta.de> References: <20051118014055.GK11494@stusta.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 17 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt are long deprecated, mark them as __deprecated > on i386. > Problem is, nobody's fixing these things. There's no point in adding spam to the kernel build unless it actually gets us some action, and I haven't seen any evidence that it does. Stick it under CONFIG_I_AM_A_DEVELOPER_WHO_HAS_TIME_TO_FIX_STUFF. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/