Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 26/30] coresight: Use platform agnostic names
To:     mike.leach@linaro.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
References: <1558521304-27469-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
 <1558521304-27469-27-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
 <CAJ9a7VhwHeN5uSEwDhLVR=CL=vgCfKHtWZ3o8NnLnxw_=mYBOg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Message-ID: <80e9fc21-cf1b-4118-52d5-7268f5470d1c@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:12:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJ9a7VhwHeN5uSEwDhLVR=CL=vgCfKHtWZ3o8NnLnxw_=mYBOg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mike,

On 29/05/2019 10:32, Mike Leach wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Why am I not seeing references to coresight-cpu-debug in here? In
> other places in this patchset CPU debug has been changed, but there
> appears to be no platform agnostic name here, nor any ACPI type name
> either. Is cpu-debug remaining device tree only? Should CPU debug not
> be treated like ETM and get a cpu centric name?

Thats because they are not registered as coresight devices and thus do
not appear on the CoreSight bus under /sys/bus/coresight/. This set is
only tuning the "coresight" device names, linked to the real amba device.

Cheers
Suzuki