Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJKOXPcTVpLtSSs=Q0G3fQgXYoVa=kHxWcWXyvS13ie73ByZBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190603135939.e2mb7vkxp64qairr@pc636> <CAJKOXPdczUnsaBeXTuutZXCQ70ejDT68xnVm-e+SSdLZi-vyCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190604003153.76f33dd2@canb.auug.org.au> <CAJKOXPed=npnfk0H2WUDityHg5cPLH_zwShyRd+B2RS8h6C7SQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190604011125.266222a8@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20190604011125.266222a8@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jun 2019 20:31:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPf3LZuQ5o5sERL_b6+4SfERWyQR0jUaVUJs12m7WdD3gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG BISECT] bug mm/vmalloc.c:470 (mm/vmalloc.c: get rid of one
 single unlink_va() when merge)
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 17:11, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:35:22 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 16:32, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:10:40 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Indeed it looks like effect of merge conflict resolution or applying.
> > > > When I look at MMOTS, it is the same as yours:
> > > > http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit.cgi/linux-mmots.git/commit/?id=b77b8cce67f246109f9d87417a32cd38f0398f2f
> > > >
> > > > However in linux-next it is different.
> > > >
> > > > Stephen, any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Have you had a look at today's linux-next?  It looks correct in
> > > there.  Andrew updated his patch series over the weekend.
> >
> > Yes, I am looking at today's next. Both the source code and the commit
> > 728e0fbf263e3ed359c10cb13623390564102881 have wrong "if (merged)" (put
> > in wrong hunk).
>
> OK, I have replaced that commit with this:

Thank you!

Best regards,
Krzysztof