Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 3 Jun 2019 21:04:57 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@gmail.com>
Cc:     Carmeli Tamir <carmeli.tamir@gmail.com>,
        Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@gmail.com>,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: emxx_udc: fix warning "sum of probable
 bitmasks, consider |"
Message-ID: <20190603190457.GA6487@kroah.com>
References: <20190603185412.GA11183@hari-Inspiron-1545>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190603185412.GA11183@hari-Inspiron-1545>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:24:12AM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> Knowing the fact that operator '|' is faster than '+'.
> Its better we replace + with | in this case.
> 
> Issue reported by coccicheck
> drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h:94:34-35: WARNING: sum of probable
> bitmasks, consider |
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h
> index b8c3dee..88d6bda 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int vbus_irq;
>  #define BIT30		0x40000000
>  #define BIT31		0x80000000

All of those BITXX defines should be removed and the "real" BIT(X) macro
used instead.

> -#define TEST_FORCE_ENABLE		(BIT18 + BIT16)
> +#define TEST_FORCE_ENABLE		(BIT18 | BIT16)

It really doesn't matter, a good compiler will have already turned this
into a constant value so you really do not know if this is less/faster
code or not, right?

Did you look at the output to verify this actually changed anything?

thanks,

greg k-h