Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161104AbVKRM73 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:59:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161106AbVKRM73 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:59:29 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.192]:59142 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161104AbVKRM72 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:59:28 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=m6VgIOm3+C+Irr2BKHFIT8db9FBF4+iH82bawoJYk5L6ux6niEusokT0c8g+0ng9JOZnYDUhhIs8HN0NMM3+Pn/Jh/acpm4P4JOy2SnQZduSWm8IUHgSPJ+JegTGiGI5euuUIlxepnB4z6vfa7lLnjgnQ31p2ws/u51w40ro2I4= Message-ID: <6880bed30511180459s66efa480y9a8c5f90b1bc73ac@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:59:27 +0100 From: Bas Westerbaan To: Arijit Das Subject: Re: Does Linux has File Stream mapping support...? Cc: 7eggert@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <7EC22963812B4F40AE780CF2F140AFE920906A@IN01WEMBX1.internal.synopsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <7EC22963812B4F40AE780CF2F140AFE920906A@IN01WEMBX1.internal.synopsys.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2157 Lines: 58 Maybe an (ugly) way around it would be to simply use a parent process which captures the stdout of your compiler and writes it to the log file and prints it to its own stdout. On 11/18/05, Arijit Das wrote: > Ye...I know of tee. > > But the issue here is I have a HUGE Compiler (an Simulation tool) in which thousands of places there are "printf" statements to print messages to STDOUT stream. Now, a requirement came up which needs all those messages thrown to STDOUT also to be logged in a LOGFILE (in addition to STDOUT). Yes, this can be done through tee...but the usage model of the compiler doesn't leave that possibility open for me. > > So, am looking for a solution inside the Compiler code. > > Thanks, > Arijit > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bodo Eggert [mailto:harvested.in.lkml@7eggert.dyndns.org] > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:00 PM > To: Arijit Das; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Does Linux has File Stream mapping support...? > > Arijit Das wrote: > > > Is it possible to have File Stream Mapping in Linux? What I mean is > > this... > > > > FILE * fp1 = fopen("/foo", "w"); > > FILE * fp2 = fopen("/bar", "w"); > > FILE * fp_common = (fp1, fp2); > > > > fprint(fp_common, "This should be written to both files ... /foo and > > /bar"); > > It's a userspace problem. man "tee". > > Doing this in the kernel would be horrible. > > -- > Ich danke GMX daf?r, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF > verbreiteten L?gen zu sabotieren. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- Bas Westerbaan http://blog.w-nz.com/ GPG Public Keys: http://w-nz.com/keys/bas.westerbaan.asc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/