Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 3 Jun 2019 23:41:55 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc:     Anup.Patel@wdc.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, schwab@suse.de,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>, anup@brainfault.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: defconfig: Enable NO_HZ_IDLE and HIGH_RES_TIMERS
Message-ID: <20190604064155.GA21667@infradead.org>
References: <mhng-faba08ec-69a7-43b1-b2d7-c2e996751506@palmer-si-x1c4>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1906030944170.9338@viisi.sifive.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1906030944170.9338@viisi.sifive.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 09:44:44AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
> 
> Thanks, queued for v5.3.

Where do you apply these patches to?  Is there a chance we could just
set up a multi commiter riscv tree insted of growing the number of
trees?