DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=cvocgOcwt+m9lnyMshyw0l1FE2hOPhA9p4dB5uK9YfXHAjR/NaQH3d1lXUJzuDtIx+soUtMG3dy/eWqBhMWnZ38EIlL7Oj1xj78sT+02TRous82QJeZ/mWzBl3Q7iWFP7hUaUuJSkdjMyHAyBlH+Ala/h6sq6xKTOwfC5GMZUJY=
Message-ID: <fb7befa20511180851i70e1017cp423db24d7d561082@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:51:41 -0500
From: Adayadil Thomas <adayadil.thomas@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Conntrack helper modules ( 2.6.9 vs 2.6.12)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 866
Lines: 29

Greetings.

The place where the connection tracking helper modules are called from changed
from 2.6.9 to 2.6.12.

In 2.6.9, helper modules were called from ip_conntrack_core.c (
ip_conntrack_in function)

In 2.6.12, the helper modules are called from
ip_conntrack_standalone.c (ip_conntrack_help funtion)


I would like to use the 2.6.12 kernel, but with helper modules called
like in 2.6.9

I was wondering if other parts of the system would be affetcted if I
put the helper module call in
ip_conntrack_in and remove the call from ip_conntrack_help


Any help or information is greatly appreciated.

Thanks a lot,
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/