Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp5498117ybi; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:33:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxlxLkS2hnicYWqf+d7FOQZdWIJunDfygMyaNdLZc17LDOe+Y7iPVvldfl5BW4PidRseAVw X-Received: by 2002:a63:f10e:: with SMTP id f14mr35407972pgi.226.1559658806800; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 07:33:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559658806; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Iv9QxDFtITl4QE7IBYbqDB7IVExqJ/Z+R6TZZOkX+C38tWj9QB9tOCRe1jtMqMLYRF X5T/Re0IEO7fo61yQFE7KK58l0/UKZLc+0sg5++o5AXJGJu0w8sUao4rAWW3HkMG5xfy +78Y7QNTPxep8DMi/IyExHBtSQNmbfQgkiXK8tOH3PmD9jV2yngKfjIut3HVgWbPsaHa RCUdWIbwtLRcbPF+zymGAVaBGyKd8YBUWy/wpqJQ/oqj1aZtzUByDNGBaCXVLHejIx0e eWDpMYBvohVq66JvNze9nkHMykR4eLBE3m5FdB2NxVXRkok2aoNrLoyNIAGRLbQvR8gN GuLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=4wAAPBQ4+NpeEXU4lSsSOtb7EcBJAM7FyxCTvNmq6gs=; b=w35/NSNC5z6mD7pOxAHxwZJxIsHP/trs4F/vEjktMf6S758S8DXYXOkgB45AJ2rb7d qa0IxV5i9MUWpFAxw1mCel7bLHsOKqe0V1acSdICOoz6kPPp1q39TlnK8toXuVkh19C2 BEsiuy+rxYnLK8p0nPRf/JU6ZV7YHoPhWzTLIn/USYSUairqscrwYBkYOErv2YZhRmDF Tvp+kYtKLFGiQmMtOhL2+u6tkP0dQdLMTOPgHlW1Gk9KQFtOMA0GNwbV7aGptWLgudQk Z9A5De1qXPFNyESFKi//BtOFYyr5tahAFeHnVzO4e9MmzfySzGCDP1+Rc11dj6GZXVFV Xpxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p5si22579910pls.431.2019.06.04.07.33.09; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 07:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727588AbfFDOa0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:30:26 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:45294 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727347AbfFDOaZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:30:25 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41343341; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C5B83F690; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:30:20 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Qian Cai , rppt@linux.ibm.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arm64/mm: fix a bogus GFP flag in pgd_alloc() Message-ID: <20190604143020.GD24467@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1559656836-24940-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw> <20190604142338.GC24467@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190604142338.GC24467@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+11 (2f07cb52) (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:23:38PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 10:00:36AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote: > > The commit "arm64: switch to generic version of pte allocation" > > introduced endless failures during boot like, > > > > kobject_add_internal failed for pgd_cache(285:chronyd.service) (error: > > -2 parent: cgroup) > > > > It turns out __GFP_ACCOUNT is passed to kernel page table allocations > > and then later memcg finds out those don't belong to any cgroup. > > Mike, I understood from [1] that this wasn't expected to be a problem, > as the accounting should bypass kernel threads. > > Was that assumption wrong, or is something different happening here? > > > backtrace: > > kobject_add_internal > > kobject_init_and_add > > sysfs_slab_add+0x1a8 > > __kmem_cache_create > > create_cache > > memcg_create_kmem_cache > > memcg_kmem_cache_create_func > > process_one_work > > worker_thread > > kthread > > > > Signed-off-by: Qian Cai > > --- > > arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c > > index 769516cb6677..53c48f5c8765 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) > > if (PGD_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE) > > return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(gfp); > > else > > - return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, gfp); > > + return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL); > > This is used to allocate PGDs for both user and kernel pagetables (e.g. > for the efi runtime services), so while this may fix the regression, I'm > not sure it's the right fix. I see that since [1], pgd_alloc() was updated to special-case the init_mm, which is not sufficient for cases like: efi_mm.pgd = pgd_alloc(&efi_mm) ... which occurs in a kthread. So let's have a pgd_alloc_kernel() to make that explicit. Thanks, Mark.