Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp5598967ybi; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:02:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxACd2eK0gQh0IwGgzlfXaxJr3Kc7WjmL5jiKsPn/X9pEHrFKoe0cIPoDBAyl0hlxdbDx4q X-Received: by 2002:a62:5847:: with SMTP id m68mr32513680pfb.67.1559664140902; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 09:02:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559664140; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oLLYYdaLUgzst/m/v4QSwh/NTc6CqKz2xBYNcPg62fGnMrVhpzBcW/bjWfB1UTsmBH OQlvOL54EGhN1ccAbDk871tYVGgwHfkb5CkD/w/XILGAQ7gtg2Q9fwjMpcIs78bOq8MQ xGIt3h4uMJ6kurw3LtuqWfbufugjLZ159/73Spxh3swL36MOY6SWuhZhtCtoOcq4bUYK bCSyBcMSiHAvzpyCdnLvONfewvF7OWLYPNlHyBrCOzTmoQn6bywzFc3yGZ8hvWMopgwY 2H/W/wrj1fx21GXbCBRR29146ZTBTbx7Gx5Sl3wzRsIRHgt+ZForhZx+sY4dZYaFDigT 0S3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=xZH8VaezNnKIkka5LNnJWemIEKd4ymYzh3e/khMNocQ=; b=FbBoNX0siop9SAv64n/To3dVEmbwd8DNhoFQhSjEp3nbWAkcol7b+jkjb3+qBEIHwA OOX+8FxVdw9s2Lnn96RcPvK1q623lBfIKjuq1HQtJafXC18wn/u94CTP4fBZoF4tCIHB x6CZvbT0r+xPfNxiZnMsAomitJUuX3IK5xU9S6EgyDqwdfamYs3XiS7hFT48A0sjynf4 wp4YP1NXIePc3CiHLa1gIfFKOnu03IciM0ROm/aB63hLhU1M1xCvUcmi30kt1l4JzWwu NNbpLatgVphHBybQRiVxXEGwW4pnRAPoe3rl4Ok9a5hAHcuG4B77Uz1vaGDSutalzJMk Y8eA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m11si7256351pla.423.2019.06.04.09.02.02; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 09:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728226AbfFDQAq (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:00:46 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:48465 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727422AbfFDQAq (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:00:46 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jun 2019 09:00:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from marshy.an.intel.com (HELO [10.122.105.159]) ([10.122.105.159]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2019 09:00:45 -0700 Subject: Re: A potential broken at platform driver? To: Greg KH , Romain Izard Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, atull@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, sen.li@intel.com, Richard Gong References: <1559074833-1325-1-git-send-email-richard.gong@linux.intel.com> <1559074833-1325-3-git-send-email-richard.gong@linux.intel.com> <20190528232224.GA29225@kroah.com> <1e3b5447-b776-f929-bca6-306f90ac0856@linux.intel.com> <20190603180255.GA18054@kroah.com> <20190604103241.GA4097@5WDYG62> <20190604142803.GA28355@kroah.com> From: Richard Gong Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 11:13:02 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190604142803.GA28355@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On 6/4/19 9:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:33:03PM +0200, Romain Izard wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 08:02:55PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>>> @@ -394,7 +432,7 @@ static struct platform_driver stratix10_rsu_driver = { >>>> .remove = stratix10_rsu_remove, >>>> .driver = { >>>> .name = "stratix10-rsu", >>>> - .groups = rsu_groups, >>>> +// .groups = rsu_groups, >>> >>> Are you sure this is the correct pointer? I think that might be >>> pointing to the driver's attributes, not the device's attributes. >>> >>> If platform drivers do not have a way to register groups properly, then >>> that really needs to be fixed, as trying to register it by yourself as >>> you are doing, is ripe for racing with userspace. >> >> This is a very common issue with platform drivers, and it seems to me that >> it is not possible to add device attributes when binding a device to a >> driver without entering the race condition. >> >> My understanding is the following one: >> >> The root cause is that the device has already been created and reported >> to the userspace with a KOBJ_ADD uevent before the device and the driver >> are bound together. On receiving this event, userspace will react, and >> it will try to read the device's attributes. In parallel the kernel will >> try to find a matching driver. If a driver is found, the kernel will >> call the probe function from the driver with the device as a parameter, >> and if successful a KOBJ_BIND uevent will be sent to userspace, but this >> is a recent addition. >> >> Unfortunately, not all created devices will be bound to a driver, and the >> existing udev code relies on KOBJ_ADD uevents rather than KOBJ_BIND uevents. >> If new per-device attributes have been added to the device during the >> binding stage userspace may or may not see them, depending on when userspace >> tries to read the device's attributes. >> >> I have this possible workaround, but I do not know if it is a good solution: >> >> When binding the device and the driver together, create a new device as a >> child to the current device, and fill its "groups" member to point to the >> per-device attributes' group. As the device will be created with all the >> attributes, it will not be affected by the race issues. The functions >> handling the attributes will need to be modified to use the parents of their >> "device" parameter, instead of the device itself. Additionnaly, the sysfs >> location of the attributes will be different, as the child device will show >> up in the sysfs path. But for a newly introduced device this will not be >> a problem. >> >> Is this a good compromise ? > > Not really. You just want the attributes on the platform device itself. > > Given the horrible hack that platform devices are today, what's one more > hack! > > Here's a patch below of what should probably be done here. Richard, can > you change your code to use the new dev_groups pointer in the struct > platform_driver and this patch and let me know if that works or not? > > Note, I've only compiled this code, not tested it... > Your patch works. Many thanks for your help! Regards, Richard > thanks, > > greg k-h > > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c > index 4d1729853d1a..3dd4b73a9b30 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c > @@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full( > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_register_full); > > +static int platform_drv_remove(struct device *_dev); > static int platform_drv_probe(struct device *_dev) > { > struct platform_driver *drv = to_platform_driver(_dev->driver); > @@ -614,8 +615,18 @@ static int platform_drv_probe(struct device *_dev) > > if (drv->probe) { > ret = drv->probe(dev); > - if (ret) > + if (ret) { > dev_pm_domain_detach(_dev, true); > + goto out; > + } > + } > + if (drv->dev_groups) { > + ret = device_add_groups(_dev, drv->dev_groups); > + if (ret) { > + platform_drv_remove(_dev); > + return ret; > + } > + kobject_uevent(&_dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE); > } > > out: > @@ -640,6 +651,8 @@ static int platform_drv_remove(struct device *_dev) > > if (drv->remove) > ret = drv->remove(dev); > + if (drv->dev_groups) > + device_remove_groups(_dev, drv->dev_groups); > dev_pm_domain_detach(_dev, true); > > return ret; > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h b/include/linux/platform_device.h > index cc464850b71e..027f1e1d7af8 100644 > --- a/include/linux/platform_device.h > +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h > @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ struct platform_driver { > int (*resume)(struct platform_device *); > struct device_driver driver; > const struct platform_device_id *id_table; > + const struct attribute_group **dev_groups; > bool prevent_deferred_probe; > }; > >