Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp5934121ybi; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:08:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxfbAciU+OEkLW8a4dAOuVlQvtu7pxr6Ydz7/apYcqudQojd4vqyvxsx7+FJB/qgSwSYn8n X-Received: by 2002:a63:2d6:: with SMTP id 205mr127651pgc.114.1559686120735; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:08:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559686120; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=o7S04Z3ciAhbMVk+JSwdww3/JozYFOHim70u//tyrAUMTFTvPTMqbuNRSZzeZ+nQQI 96AdlQbUxzCC94sOE0EjtqiVnTXZkVoXVoIuoqtBYytJwrzwC3K6SobKJ9vac3+lb7mO jrvGZ+kl8bPcGm9vjggxtyA8bleQlFpQk8ShMcipwLI2wYrv15oTePVvaoCHaHcbcgVp RaNc5R8E8iCevp72XYNPybhIZe/KnLN2p7e60ntG5ySaQ9MIRNPSBsAahFnQWTs9dAGl FRJ6Q2yS1NpK+l/O8PpCv7s/HZZ1WYSL+BnEurPunvLckpebf3lN7qVystHdcM0PLRMn M6SA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=PpKRuZzE7T8mOmzox/3fZWCQGJE/CKE/yKMFRhJ3Gf8=; b=fDQxomhG6W/1npWwSrmg0RnmGr38R+nCdxx3aQCgvtuEKD4ZlYdreyffpzW2wBDykn t8ZOjxkP6j6pHjQ79EvXkppwB70vRR2qPA+rzVgX8zjhs4+OaCS8z9+H+9LwOsSr9dpb 3TPRlV9mexjkBbpLMcRsMERdvMFO/cvB7owauxl/d21L+igkgHge5lUl/tFx2HvqXisL NJ3LjlmwH1ZSk+9C+5QoYmQbW+u4YyIjkNFdrCwERgnceTR2lhDlU7H5O1U8CJOVrYBx L0cxlT4pqVyDmO6WpjiQd2jaRrBSbFXxvro7zvHDboGwFtpO5fRU9173O/FhShe3Yzd3 J/YA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=r8eh4ERe; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s24si28134979pfd.78.2019.06.04.15.08.23; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=r8eh4ERe; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726464AbfFDWHU (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 18:07:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f67.google.com ([209.85.208.67]:39341 "EHLO mail-ed1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726293AbfFDWHU (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 18:07:20 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f67.google.com with SMTP id m10so2661699edv.6; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:07:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PpKRuZzE7T8mOmzox/3fZWCQGJE/CKE/yKMFRhJ3Gf8=; b=r8eh4EReBOdbIPu4A1NNDGdXjFzs0/kcbitZHKKZAYaKNhXocwZblb/UDa/qHzpM4n H2elaGGk/e0gnNHPNwXKeHcAQnQ8whjG7luxPB1MehVQyRYd3L+0WhuLTmYgNONF0vQW /gT+d74vRjcqjUKUEja8QETsFhVds03K5SF2Vi+Gp28hsN/co8yAmDLlQo3XBDCsBx2t f10hoB3oefeCwKc/mwr3FNtMVXdQwW6jVfZhmt0IMWacdGBiHQOhNJfFHpgBzQfAMbQK Rzmp33l1qbOkzsE3obd4pS9v0hxJDLo8arS3ayyMB+ypJKFinJf8JyWlCou/md606BC2 cf8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PpKRuZzE7T8mOmzox/3fZWCQGJE/CKE/yKMFRhJ3Gf8=; b=VVMn/M3UcxAeVwwvprb9DeDiiwL5J6gpdhUqqppY08Q/uqGMGj00bkWfL6+9K2OWtD BQdkStQguQ15mSQMGoV1OOWUXlUj7ylH7Ii48Xy9jTCLTk9baJB8WUl9ViIGmdlhqqQi /KTkD6uvxXJBcM+yn0+BLyTPZC9dxoPryqCWaPRnxAGw8m3f9Ww017vbWMQppByKlIiS bXnGog0NuAnfRHaGvxCGHFOkPCKl/DdhylZqR+b50h3Cim3buckkLFMAN8oJ4uF8T9sN gAsW7Av7R9VgpRTFksYCayhyiufW18kgRNE0ZsWW/JK7i7EkspMNaiS+8fhv39f3qTfw VEcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUYAUHT/6RRT5msgFlZh/T1sK+ER6tj4X+ppYuTw1cOL1WZ/taF hen9duoHKLNcVo5a44HCPv8= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c3c9:: with SMTP id l9mr30726945edr.23.1559686037033; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.92.221.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g18sm5036344edh.13.2019.06.04.15.07.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:07:15 +0000 From: Wei Yang To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Dan Williams , Wei Yang , Igor Mammedov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "mike.travis@hpe.com" , Andrew Banman , Ingo Molnar , Alex Deucher , "David S. Miller" , Mark Brown , Chris Wilson , Oscar Salvador , Jonathan Cameron , Michal Hocko , Pavel Tatashin , Arun KS , Mathieu Malaterre Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove memory block devices before arch_remove_memory() Message-ID: <20190604220715.d4d2ctwjk25vd5sq@master> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20190527111152.16324-1-david@redhat.com> <20190527111152.16324-10-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190527111152.16324-10-david@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:11:50PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >Let's factor out removing of memory block devices, which is only >necessary for memory added via add_memory() and friends that created >memory block devices. Remove the devices before calling >arch_remove_memory(). > >This finishes factoring out memory block device handling from >arch_add_memory() and arch_remove_memory(). > >Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman >Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >Cc: David Hildenbrand >Cc: "mike.travis@hpe.com" >Cc: Andrew Morton >Cc: Andrew Banman >Cc: Ingo Molnar >Cc: Alex Deucher >Cc: "David S. Miller" >Cc: Mark Brown >Cc: Chris Wilson >Cc: Oscar Salvador >Cc: Jonathan Cameron >Cc: Michal Hocko >Cc: Pavel Tatashin >Cc: Arun KS >Cc: Mathieu Malaterre >Reviewed-by: Dan Williams >Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand >--- > drivers/base/memory.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- > drivers/base/node.c | 11 ++++++----- > include/linux/memory.h | 2 +- > include/linux/node.h | 6 ++---- > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 +++-- > 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c >index 5a0370f0c506..f28efb0bf5c7 100644 >--- a/drivers/base/memory.c >+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c >@@ -763,32 +763,31 @@ int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) > return ret; > } > >-void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *section) >+/* >+ * Remove memory block devices for the given memory area. Start and size >+ * have to be aligned to memory block granularity. Memory block devices >+ * have to be offline. >+ */ >+void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) > { >+ const int start_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start)); >+ const int end_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start + size)); > struct memory_block *mem; >+ int block_id; > >- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!present_section(section))) >+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(start, memory_block_size_bytes()) || >+ !IS_ALIGNED(size, memory_block_size_bytes()))) > return; > > mutex_lock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); >- >- /* >- * Some users of the memory hotplug do not want/need memblock to >- * track all sections. Skip over those. >- */ >- mem = find_memory_block(section); >- if (!mem) >- goto out_unlock; >- >- unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem, __section_nr(section)); >- >- mem->section_count--; >- if (mem->section_count == 0) >+ for (block_id = start_block_id; block_id != end_block_id; block_id++) { >+ mem = find_memory_block_by_id(block_id, NULL); >+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem)) >+ continue; >+ mem->section_count = 0; Is this step necessary? >+ unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(mem); > unregister_memory(mem); >- else >- put_device(&mem->dev); >- >-out_unlock: >+ } > mutex_unlock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); > } > >diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c >index 8598fcbd2a17..04fdfa99b8bc 100644 >--- a/drivers/base/node.c >+++ b/drivers/base/node.c >@@ -801,9 +801,10 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg) > return 0; > } > >-/* unregister memory section under all nodes that it spans */ >-int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, >- unsigned long phys_index) >+/* >+ * Unregister memory block device under all nodes that it spans. >+ */ >+int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > { > NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL); > unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn; >@@ -816,8 +817,8 @@ int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > return -ENOMEM; > nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes); > >- sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index); >- sect_end_pfn = sect_start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1; >+ sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr); >+ sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr); > for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) { > int nid; > >diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h >index db3e8567f900..f26a5417ec5d 100644 >--- a/include/linux/memory.h >+++ b/include/linux/memory.h >@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ extern void unregister_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > extern int register_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > extern void unregister_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size); >-extern void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *); >+void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size); > extern int memory_dev_init(void); > extern int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); > extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); >diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h >index 1a557c589ecb..02a29e71b175 100644 >--- a/include/linux/node.h >+++ b/include/linux/node.h >@@ -139,8 +139,7 @@ extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); > extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); > extern int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > void *arg); >-extern int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, >- unsigned long phys_index); >+extern int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk); > > extern int register_memory_node_under_compute_node(unsigned int mem_nid, > unsigned int cpu_nid, >@@ -176,8 +175,7 @@ static inline int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > { > return 0; > } >-static inline int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, >- unsigned long phys_index) >+static inline int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > { > return 0; > } >diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c >index 9a92549ef23b..82136c5b4c5f 100644 >--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c >+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c >@@ -520,8 +520,6 @@ static void __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms, > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!valid_section(ms))) > return; > >- unregister_memory_section(ms); >- > scn_nr = __section_nr(ms); > start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn((unsigned long)scn_nr); > __remove_zone(zone, start_pfn); >@@ -1845,6 +1843,9 @@ void __ref __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) > memblock_free(start, size); > memblock_remove(start, size); > >+ /* remove memory block devices before removing memory */ >+ remove_memory_block_devices(start, size); >+ > arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL); > __release_memory_resource(start, size); > >-- >2.20.1 -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me