Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 4 Jun 2019 23:17:48 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Uwe Kleine-Konig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] sched: Add new tracepoints required for EAS
 testing
Message-ID: <20190605061748.GA20661@infradead.org>
References: <20190604111459.2862-1-qais.yousef@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190604111459.2862-1-qais.yousef@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> The following patches add the bare minimum tracepoints required to perform EAS
> testing in Lisa[1].

What is EAS?  Whhy is "Lisa" not part of the patch submission?
submission.

> It is done in this way because adding new TRACE_EVENTS() is no longer accepted
> AFAIU.

Huh?  We keep adding trace events all the time.  And they actually
are useful because they are testable.

This series on the other hand adds exports not used in tree, which is
a big no-go.