Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp6355404ybi; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 23:22:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzpkGs+YmoFCkA8OzWtebPC4I590rdER0PsMmETo2mpoG2UdcKKl+JEsGz/+271JDP5+NZI X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:192:: with SMTP id 18mr42281977pjc.107.1559715767025; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 23:22:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559715767; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tdtpz3kS5O3FzKaktK+cJRV8bJtZ1nzK9e4rZjeJhL8XgPUo4oqTeOcLWnLMzD9Ues J7DNL1ZKlCjcMzrZdHiy2sflPX5hUfJrCbZk9W2UbJTbUZp/AKhIGllvnaMPt1bgE+uu YaUKMPN5t1Oc9MSzKfJgtJ/ckCl9yzGnCXNxJYHMDHqROCQQ86QWPfG6Y9U6rsPRnoSc V9SwJr2TH+mWdvlD35RLescQDt0VfFuNdDbmgtz8uaeERUJPwH9nd6vv+4LfirmclHRD aPjBNjXLX6xmBU0HOshXHvuVflaRXSJ3OXRSPTH26hjyluaFsTXAIxUs0xEK+YQ6J9/V /05g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=Ojboyi9ZYqHo5qkbWSZookahlhHYjfJvXncHmnUVX7w=; b=ECJiwvf+u583gia2BfV3MnNq7vrJb7wrNant/riv2vxWAZ/OOsqs2HA0G9w7RwTIyw gWCtLlbYeJ0rq/uSymoMnj3yL1pcf2X7B4mtWp0yljVmGICnQx4DRtDjCBRXYa+LhacM EpxYyFh530EDlBCd8NITG8uJDhBAQ7MdijTKhAVkBSI1CHN6Cp6CntYzcRcwG/Fwunbs 6dabVRinxDw659hsUPYUOAr3fU8ne8Zwb6XPlZVNt/VjBP2Zwc99cxZBz+u2h4zpzH20 UuwglTnqkocTuQFpJpiBIj9xCj4uaBZDJsCFS/WaU88IxcLDrIjg36YZqIc+lm85eLlS 1FPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nifty.com header.s=dec2015msa header.b=kiWAsPzD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d4si27726611pfr.82.2019.06.04.23.22.30; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 23:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nifty.com header.s=dec2015msa header.b=kiWAsPzD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726541AbfFEGUZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 02:20:25 -0400 Received: from conssluserg-02.nifty.com ([210.131.2.81]:53717 "EHLO conssluserg-02.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726050AbfFEGUY (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 02:20:24 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f42.google.com (mail-vs1-f42.google.com [209.85.217.42]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-02.nifty.com with ESMTP id x556K9Te018192 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:20:10 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-02.nifty.com x556K9Te018192 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1559715610; bh=Ojboyi9ZYqHo5qkbWSZookahlhHYjfJvXncHmnUVX7w=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=kiWAsPzD3A2U5JCaZA1yCur4gPQVsZoQFvLRwgdSbsfgdtnKj8Co9QhLEsduv/8zY eovuP/IWHJffnX+mktAFQi/JxGU4IDi5Yw9pJSm3c18dDTpbaIrK40ZhCYB76W/+CB xGALKCCI03OJffIiRybiGDrsU6ANGHvUFyqzcAlk6bPh/iPgRI9Tm0ezKN/uCHkE7a 7Q6iNAcF05acWT9ISSZ65LzVnb6X9hsr0hEeUQVw8smTzzaH1Sx4uEiQNlc3GeA0NI 33fNl1ACcYgLgSKnMiiv0ryveXAej0Sp+SeAZuJkY6fsSFUMuXp3ATKsK5179HbzOV ldvWYNlyGB1rQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.217.42] Received: by mail-vs1-f42.google.com with SMTP id u124so4488025vsu.2 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 23:20:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXWmMxp2iBMbF8Fas0aPsvEuAUPNiiufDluekVt3aKLj+BFB941 ZIZC5YmjtNqidG0PdRNB3ivhd1HU21RxNXfPkYg= X-Received: by 2002:a67:cd1a:: with SMTP id u26mr605229vsl.155.1559715609026; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 23:20:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190527083412.26651-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> In-Reply-To: <20190527083412.26651-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:19:33 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow assembly code to use BIT(), GENMASK(), etc. and clean-up arm64 header To: linux-arm-kernel , Will Deacon Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Catalin Marinas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Will, Is this series applicable to arm64 tree? Thanks. On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 5:37 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > Some in-kernel headers use _BITUL() instead of BIT(). > > arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > arch/s390/include/asm/*.h > > I think the reason is because BIT() is currently not available > in assembly. It hard-codes 1UL, which is not available in assembly. > > 1/2 replaced > 1UL -> UL(1) > 0UL -> UL(0) > 1ULL -> ULL(1) > 0ULL -> ULL(0) > > With this, there is no more restriction that prevents assembly > code from using them. > > 2/2 is a clean-up as as example. > > I can contribute to cleanups of arch/s390/, etc. > once this series lands in upstream. > > I hope both patches can go in the arm64 tree. > > > > Masahiro Yamada (2): > linux/bits.h: make BIT(), GENMASK(), and friends available in assembly > arm64: replace _BITUL() with BIT() > > arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 82 ++++++++++++++++----------------- > include/linux/bits.h | 17 ++++--- > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada