Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 5 Jun 2019 11:51:41 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
To:     =?utf-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUMOpcm9u?= <peron.clem@gmail.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/13] media: rc: sunxi: Add RXSTA bits definition
Message-ID: <20190605095141.psrq6mhk63zto77s@flea>
References: <20190604162959.29199-1-peron.clem@gmail.com>
 <20190604162959.29199-5-peron.clem@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20190604162959.29199-5-peron.clem@gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 06:29:50PM +0200, Cl?ment P?ron wrote:
> We are using RXINT bits definition when looking at RXSTA register.
>
> These bits are equal but it's not really proper.
>
> Introduce the RXSTA bits and use them to have coherency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cl?ment P?ron <peron.clem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c b/drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c
> index 0504ebfc831f..572bd2257d35 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c
> @@ -48,11 +48,11 @@
>
>  /* Rx Interrupt Enable */
>  #define SUNXI_IR_RXINT_REG    0x2C
> -/* Rx FIFO Overflow */
> +/* Rx FIFO Overflow Interrupt Enable */
>  #define REG_RXINT_ROI_EN		BIT(0)
> -/* Rx Packet End */
> +/* Rx Packet End Interrupt Enable */
>  #define REG_RXINT_RPEI_EN		BIT(1)
> -/* Rx FIFO Data Available */
> +/* Rx FIFO Data Available Interrupt Enable */
>  #define REG_RXINT_RAI_EN		BIT(4)
>
>  /* Rx FIFO available byte level */
> @@ -60,6 +60,12 @@
>
>  /* Rx Interrupt Status */
>  #define SUNXI_IR_RXSTA_REG    0x30
> +/* Rx FIFO Overflow */
> +#define REG_RXSTA_ROI			BIT(0)
> +/* Rx Packet End */
> +#define REG_RXSTA_RPE			BIT(1)
> +/* Rx FIFO Data Available */
> +#define REG_RXSTA_RA			BIT(4)

I'm fine with it on principle, but if the consistency needs to be
maintained then we could just reuse the above defines

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com