Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp7805284ybi; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 01:39:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqygFKIsjcLuJwRvaoSB2qRp5OIyoJSuYgEmrzvV2LndQX5CRivoHVQbSRruLlh0RTbMX4Jd X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:5c2:: with SMTP id f60mr49093576plf.61.1559810391803; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 01:39:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559810391; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GikVWAQjfB65oXff1HrGn7qD7nx+i7s2qgAVX9xeUQEUqgG0VyH4GCk9TqzKMBgUpz vJB645pcpRUDu2m816FJiV7efnF2MruSeYNneWKhu8Lcl+maJcqyBIVCW7U4RDQeKN7E 1wFaI5/FtZwR530sG0TVzHWGxsSFmoIpXQYBNgucp5e8nd8udE6Nlj0BFreBUOvwgwzF CWIAzBVJ9QZvZRGiYWzCkyowQD7q8/uUwvSH7ku4MoJBWT8Hkboth7fYGy7tk2BT8KNb PkXL7g+ZO2hEYqDaFwB6Xd4VCxtZabv6vuIAW4cKIncSqoDFg3TBrm9+uTJ/7JHRxtXn KEvA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Bxac6WapvLTHmIGYojJbIFDA6CRYCdhPeKv8ybs2bqA=; b=GqoADH2+CvcwSoYdggcwGC0fv4SlJvHWubRXns/aK+v7X8MqSZSpguPuBTAq4WJrUn gehUDqn2NM1GoC3JP3+I9D/O+CboQD2uC1G1SoyzSry2Vg1WbWPlItcCbSyHCSdO083U qxOZs12O9IDvGgKD0gM7u8ZHN+UwsUPd+UM7vElQeG2IJFtgLeeR5aJyjGcLw1A3uCBh owB6hRgBk3UKjhnpqxyDP84HW8Cprpk78gNAy+6jWPLRvgv9skSHzeXqLRKsJJk0xKMb 3ff0O6Vm4jsj+mdcSdbrJ4xRR1kKCSQRiZb1zZU4AhF6xY9dxAekHkby0vQs5xkgUIg/ pgZg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d24si1513104pgk.106.2019.06.06.01.39.35; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 01:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727370AbfFFIhi (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 04:37:38 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:43158 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726926AbfFFIhi (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 04:37:38 -0400 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 512) id 71E038024C; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:37:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:37:35 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Jani Nikula Cc: joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel list Subject: Re: 5.2: display corruption on X60, X220 Message-ID: <20190606083735.GA975@amd> References: <20190603074004.GA15821@amd> <87v9xj15d9.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v9xj15d9.fsf@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu 2019-06-06 11:32:18, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 03 Jun 2019, Pavel Machek wrote: > > In recent kernels (5.2.0-rc1-next-20190522, 5.2-rc2) I'm getting > > display corruption in X. Usually in terminals, but also in title bars > > etc. Black areas with white lines in them, usually... > > > > Same configuration worked properly in ... probably 4.19? Then I got > > some graphics-crashes on X220 that prevented me from testing :-(. >=20 > It's pretty hard to say anything based on the above. >=20 > Anything in the logs with drm.debug=3D14 added? I see. It looks like hard-to-debug issue. Oh, interesting part is that corruption _is_ visible if I make a screenshot. Will try with drm.debug=3D... Do you do some kind of testing that would catch similar issues? Thanks, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlz40M4ACgkQMOfwapXb+vLZMACgm7iZSxYbdUCpTeiMLAPL7hEj stEAn1R7/eD7ZCus4hp6dl3hhM0MIh4A =DYR7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf--