Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp7979081ybi; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 04:51:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw3oaa2MRgjjIEOg2B7M+4gf4MSheWk+nIIYkpmHb7nSgRSjrrxApVGv77bdidE7pHpbPOQ X-Received: by 2002:a62:d0:: with SMTP id 199mr22778426pfa.253.1559821907009; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 04:51:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559821907; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UqyoaMsLwH3nhBU32cjJUBIC//bHbNcy8wyNirgXcTo1nIEhmJOv08YYX9aRK5178Z y3TurRDrBm/urG+/Tl+1os9DX+WNDjFTSKXaqyQswvVnPq+sxpGMXzDkP3rJYsDFTvKF EPnhMcCBrGP0lW8FuGR8baYtQNpI2umpz23DSFk8nfAR1msgubxXs3eciVGhqaE/5oNT JGJA2XRb6l6i6fTYUhq0UVsLn+HjKLK8aJ5uFfK/0vQPuol0nIw0qPZ14xVIPsaKLezs b3awAweaAnOK99ImK5rQWb1uv7/GCauQcSExdL07U7gjataqW5g/Tydx6WKwKCIii5RO PGKA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=PVQ8+gaf2wbXTlT9kUIDlxcENdBXt1UPoc8mUv9zA9E=; b=Nwc7c9wlCRZbyBxfrTlOZLvljslTieNa3dYsyNutVhOHbbVofLzkOan2SON81FLdtP AE9miF6bPtZsgNOuf4LKTCGrm49k8CgWDr+OyrUbRuhGEOObNIKP5amRcgh/Of7rchoO 3+IErb57EeMzEcmJMYCnpyM9PfI3zxTWn+9H/6ERFrudd79n7QP8WFj1vfXiH+Zopv75 Wv3peEIJ64TmQLgNe/yY5OfSEGXr09YFLyEEXTzo4Pzlm58eArtJByoAxbl88YQ7q3ii N727tBgLvnc1QWK7z7I4m6e+BTtH50PD2VXqBmc7gLa49XO9E0EVqg4FzYmTg/Llaf7n Zc6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=p8U8I4iT; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n9si1936896pgr.280.2019.06.06.04.51.31; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 04:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=p8U8I4iT; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727285AbfFFIea (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 04:34:30 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37792 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725267AbfFFIe3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 04:34:29 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f45.google.com (mail-lf1-f45.google.com [209.85.167.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89917208CB; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 08:34:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559810067; bh=EcbYfjSTzXWvDR617LT1wi89npTHFV8aCjNConeyuT4=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=p8U8I4iTbQmL82QiduasZTkkzU7lzXG6fQ8mCia6+fWcuiA0i03g1KxDVzaj1U6Gq lM5hTEaGIza5dyz0jw4Ss47I5FRbzg0JVE6bToOZ/yK/rlDUAFv3qjOtne21zIO5x0 9J1jHGGoa/kDd4ba9o5TBXy8Q8tUsoRU7u5nvfSc= Received: by mail-lf1-f45.google.com with SMTP id u10so146484lfm.12; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 01:34:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWqSWV03Z/DaKP5Gu2uC+CFsS2tC/lPoz681SaTyntlmJDZn4KV um1PVLAiFfhentF6D6FQJp6lOYkNOvgrkaIeQMU= X-Received: by 2002:a19:4f50:: with SMTP id a16mr22500135lfk.24.1559810065749; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 01:34:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190605165410.14606-1-l.luba@partner.samsung.com> <20190605165410.14606-3-l.luba@partner.samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <20190605165410.14606-3-l.luba@partner.samsung.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:34:14 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/13] clk: samsung: add new clocks for DMC for Exynos5422 SoC To: Lukasz Luba Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , =?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogxbtvxYJuaWVya2lld2ljeg==?= , kgene@kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi , kyungmin.park@samsung.com, Marek Szyprowski , s.nawrocki@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, keescook@chromium.org, tony@atomide.com, jroedel@suse.de, treding@nvidia.com, digetx@gmail.com, willy.mh.wolff.ml@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 18:54, Lukasz Luba wrote: > > This patch provides support for clocks needed for Dynamic Memory Controller > in Exynos5422 SoC. It adds CDREX base register addresses, new DIV, MUX and > GATE entries. > > Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c > index 34cce3c5898f..eecbfcc6b3cf 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c > @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ > #define SRC_CDREX 0x20200 > #define DIV_CDREX0 0x20500 > #define DIV_CDREX1 0x20504 > +#define GATE_BUS_CDREX0 0x20700 > +#define GATE_BUS_CDREX1 0x20704 > #define KPLL_LOCK 0x28000 > #define KPLL_CON0 0x28100 > #define SRC_KFC 0x28200 > @@ -248,6 +250,8 @@ static const unsigned long exynos5x_clk_regs[] __initconst = { > DIV_CDREX1, > SRC_KFC, > DIV_KFC0, > + GATE_BUS_CDREX0, > + GATE_BUS_CDREX1, > }; > > static const unsigned long exynos5800_clk_regs[] __initconst = { > @@ -425,6 +429,9 @@ PNAME(mout_group13_5800_p) = { "dout_osc_div", "mout_sw_aclkfl1_550_cam" }; > PNAME(mout_group14_5800_p) = { "dout_aclk550_cam", "dout_sclk_sw" }; > PNAME(mout_group15_5800_p) = { "dout_osc_div", "mout_sw_aclk550_cam" }; > PNAME(mout_group16_5800_p) = { "dout_osc_div", "mout_mau_epll_clk" }; > +PNAME(mout_mx_mspll_ccore_phy_p) = { "sclk_bpll", "mout_sclk_dpll", > + "mout_sclk_mpll", "ff_dout_spll2", > + "mout_sclk_spll", "mout_sclk_epll"}; > > /* fixed rate clocks generated outside the soc */ > static struct samsung_fixed_rate_clock > @@ -450,7 +457,7 @@ static const struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock > static const struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock > exynos5800_fixed_factor_clks[] __initconst = { > FFACTOR(0, "ff_dout_epll2", "mout_sclk_epll", 1, 2, 0), > - FFACTOR(0, "ff_dout_spll2", "mout_sclk_spll", 1, 2, 0), > + FFACTOR(CLK_FF_DOUT_SPLL2, "ff_dout_spll2", "mout_sclk_spll", 1, 2, 0), > }; > > static const struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5800_mux_clks[] __initconst = { > @@ -472,11 +479,14 @@ static const struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5800_mux_clks[] __initconst = { > MUX(0, "mout_aclk300_disp1", mout_group5_5800_p, SRC_TOP2, 24, 2), > MUX(0, "mout_aclk300_gscl", mout_group5_5800_p, SRC_TOP2, 28, 2), > > + MUX(CLK_MOUT_MX_MSPLL_CCORE_PHY, "mout_mx_mspll_ccore_phy", > + mout_mx_mspll_ccore_phy_p, SRC_TOP7, 0, 3), > + > MUX(CLK_MOUT_MX_MSPLL_CCORE, "mout_mx_mspll_ccore", > - mout_mx_mspll_ccore_p, SRC_TOP7, 16, 2), > + mout_mx_mspll_ccore_p, SRC_TOP7, 16, 3), > MUX_F(CLK_MOUT_MAU_EPLL, "mout_mau_epll_clk", mout_mau_epll_clk_5800_p, > SRC_TOP7, 20, 2, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0), > - MUX(0, "sclk_bpll", mout_bpll_p, SRC_TOP7, 24, 1), > + MUX(CLK_SCLK_BPLL, "sclk_bpll", mout_bpll_p, SRC_TOP7, 24, 1), > MUX(0, "mout_epll2", mout_epll2_5800_p, SRC_TOP7, 28, 1), > > MUX(0, "mout_aclk550_cam", mout_group3_5800_p, SRC_TOP8, 16, 3), > @@ -648,7 +658,7 @@ static const struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5x_mux_clks[] __initconst = { > > MUX(0, "mout_sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_TOP6, 0, 1), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_VPLL, "mout_sclk_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP6, 4, 1), > - MUX(0, "mout_sclk_spll", mout_spll_p, SRC_TOP6, 8, 1), > + MUX(CLK_MOUT_SCLK_SPLL, "mout_sclk_spll", mout_spll_p, SRC_TOP6, 8, 1), > MUX(0, "mout_sclk_ipll", mout_ipll_p, SRC_TOP6, 12, 1), > MUX(0, "mout_sclk_rpll", mout_rpll_p, SRC_TOP6, 16, 1), > MUX_F(CLK_MOUT_EPLL, "mout_sclk_epll", mout_epll_p, SRC_TOP6, 20, 1, > @@ -806,8 +816,21 @@ static const struct samsung_div_clock exynos5x_div_clks[] __initconst = { > "mout_aclk400_disp1", DIV_TOP2, 4, 3), > > /* CDREX Block */ > + /* > + * The three clocks below are controlled using the same register and > + * bits. They are put into one because there is a need of > + * synchronization between the BUS and DREXs (two external memory > + * interfaces). > + * They are put here to show this HW assumption and for clock > + * information summary completeness. > + */ > DIV(CLK_DOUT_PCLK_CDREX, "dout_pclk_cdrex", "dout_aclk_cdrex1", > DIV_CDREX0, 28, 3), > + DIV(CLK_DOUT_PCLK_DREX0, "dout_pclk_drex0", "dout_cclk_drex0", > + DIV_CDREX0, 28, 3), > + DIV(CLK_DOUT_PCLK_DREX1, "dout_pclk_drex1", "dout_cclk_drex0", > + DIV_CDREX0, 28, 3), Offline discussion with Marek and Sylwester suggested to add NOCACHE for the two clocks using the same bits. Otherwise I am fine: Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof