Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 6 Jun 2019 19:53:52 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To:     Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
Cc:     kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com, airlied@linux.ie,
        daniel@ffwll.ch, koji.matsuoka.xm@renesas.com, muroya@ksk.co.jp,
        VenkataRajesh.Kalakodima@in.bosch.com,
        Harsha.ManjulaMallikarjun@in.bosch.com,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] dt-bindings: display, renesas,du: Update 'vsps' in
 example
Message-ID: <20190606165352.GK12825@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
References: <20190606142220.1392-1-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
 <20190606142220.1392-4-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190606142220.1392-4-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jacopo,

Thank you for the patch.

On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:22:03PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Update the 'vsps' property structure in the documentation example to
> reflect what's actually implemented in the device tree sources.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> index 100114ef11d5..262047053d31 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Example: R8A7795 (R-Car H3) ES2.0 DU
>  			 <&cpg CPG_MOD 722>,
>  			 <&cpg CPG_MOD 721>;
>  		clock-names = "du.0", "du.1", "du.2", "du.3";
> -		vsps = <&vspd0 0>, <&vspd1 0>, <&vspd2 0>, <&vspd0 1>;
> +		vsps = <&vspd0 0 &vspd1 0 &vspd2  &vspd0 1>;

The former is simpler to read than the latter in my opinion. Shouldn't
we update the .dtsi files instead ?

>  		cmms = <&cmm0 &cmm1 &cmm2 &cmm3>;
>  
>  		ports {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart