Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750829AbVKSVMe (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:12:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750844AbVKSVMd (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:12:33 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.200]:5234 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750829AbVKSVMd (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:12:33 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=PBjqWjQd96xWZV89ZtOd7IiqK2vIXWbi2/3UOb5OUP+J+cCXdgq2B2mYrrZzBNSn635MuwJHVcB61w461xauSfUDjSCigD0JKjpl8ZloNDTzpYluDE8s03eTEjxnQm9pVZ0dalKIgUu88XxIf2Al5E86umiqpZ7ympr9R0J7wEU= Subject: Re: AMD 64 system clock speed From: Chris Largret Reply-To: largret@gmail.com To: jstipins@umich.edu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20051118200132.jiwizt3ho0ook00w@web.mail.umich.edu> References: <20051118200132.jiwizt3ho0ook00w@web.mail.umich.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:12:26 -0800 Message-Id: <1132434746.18950.9.camel@shogun.daga.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Dropline GNOME Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1167 Lines: 27 On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 20:01 -0500, jstipins@umich.edu wrote: > Hi there, > > My earlier question regarding the glibc "make check" nptl/tst-clock2.c > failure turns out to be due to my system clock running 3x normal speed. > > Evidently, this is a known issue with 2.6.x kernels running on AMD 64 > processors. The "noapic" boot option fixes the clock problem, but disrupts > other things... ethernet does work, etc. The solution seems to be using > "apci=noirq noapic" as boot options. > > I am using the 2.6.14.2 kernel, and still need to use those boot parameters. > What is the current state of this bug? Interestingly, I found out last night that the 2.4.26 kernel can recognize both processors in my X2. Unfortunately, it had the same time synchronization issues as the newer 2.6.12+ kernels that I have been running. It isn't solely related to the new kernel series. -- Chris Largret - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/