Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750874AbVKSVpP (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:45:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750899AbVKSVpP (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:45:15 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:62954 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750874AbVKSVpO (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:45:14 -0500 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:41:14 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20051119.134114.115024780.davem@davemloft.net> To: wli@holomorphy.com Cc: hugh@veritas.com, akpm@osdl.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] unpaged: unifdefed PageCompound From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20051119205557.GO6916@holomorphy.com> References: <20051117.154323.10862063.davem@davemloft.net> <20051119205557.GO6916@holomorphy.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1371 Lines: 30 From: William Lee Irwin III Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:55:57 -0800 > On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, David S. Miller wrote: > >> I think this is a good change regardless of the VM_RESERVED issues. > >> I've been wanting to use this facility in some sparc64 bits in > >> the past, for example. But since it was HUGETLB guarded that > >> wasn't possible. > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:15:13PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > I've only just found that we have to supply the __GFP_COMP flag to get > > this working. And one of the routes through snd_dma_alloc_pages goes > > to sbus_alloc_consistent. Would you be happy for me to send Andrew a > > patch with sparc and sparc64 sbus_alloc_consistent including __GFP_COMP? > > Ought I to do the same in the sparc and sparc64 pci_alloc_consistent?? > > I usually end up deferring to Dave on the driver issues, but this time > I can independently agree in an informed manner. What is it needed for in this case? We never try to use those pci_alloc_consistent() pages independantly, ie. freeing up individual pages from a non-zero order allocation. Just curious. :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/