Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp384918ybi; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:36:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8hqWaewhGyTzLRiZP/ji6q1Ka1B3JGRs6pm+5z0pvDnpX6v3yHQth44cqPKEbyp7RSljf X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:aa0d:: with SMTP id k13mr6203077pjq.53.1559925411247; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:36:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559925411; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BOFNnz+6byZL9ow5T1WMRgF5Wmt4OQtNbHISI8qkK5IdZpWAyBu7XtkmbY5HDDkigr cqr8IkhemHwyumEKcTZNKQx1HxdKvRJM8pTostwN2y38gdec8PDO/9Ro0Noi2tkgoivN 4IYTgMg1i9tyNqSCj56H3mKalKi9G/S70+IV+gzYsv7zGrIgz5UYFAeuSWk1gOCBJbg3 T9uor4/LYqsKa375xpG8PIZQeW4ndhDarEko0ByFtZRIsGLeystnk4guLArZ3qJo/g4N TvgnVOPAhss0JXHlvsTrp2yQGqdhiRvwKTANVQNpE+lpo5KsNCpfiEhDaAcl1HZOHurR Dy5A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=QzewsOt2uOSUk1Ds65iNT/ZdXn0B93t1PhRSllNMX/A=; b=Op/5YacIRmvbxJYM//0o9QgTHEh64hg9lY9J4H2Esvy4ZSdchPBL2CEAS0GYPAoNsO ARRR27NDRINAyeVw2c+7EKeXauH8C66OahGCgA6yEIlAp0EIyo0zVClj0+GYag1aO8WT C41KtoIBUgMpX9AMQWZDRC7K2ZHzIM8tOJywMtPQv2K5o83bpNtMHrEtUEZORWHfELER KpyNxk/KDpvz9+Zwgzo4xkKK+tCL4niukjMjaKLpVgzt0Hl0t8InFY/2zTfG2BfxWhMw +r+c9m4slBvxaAd06CE0y6Dzj8uAgFuMT0M8/iY+voLXtyvfzh6PND4VU7j+H60/1Gu9 6NXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codethink.co.uk Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i1si2339785pld.344.2019.06.07.09.36.34; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codethink.co.uk Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730640AbfFGQfR (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:35:17 -0400 Received: from imap1.codethink.co.uk ([176.9.8.82]:53691 "EHLO imap1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728595AbfFGQfR (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:35:17 -0400 Received: from [167.98.27.226] (helo=xylophone) by imap1.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1hZHpd-0003Ry-M5; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 17:35:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1559925309.21054.9.camel@codethink.co.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/69] 4.14.124-stable review From: Ben Hutchings To: Guenter Roeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 17:35:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20190607162722.GA21998@roeck-us.net> References: <20190607153848.271562617@linuxfoundation.org> <20190607161102.GA19615@roeck-us.net> <20190607161627.GA9920@kroah.com> <20190607162722.GA21998@roeck-us.net> Organization: Codethink Ltd. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 09:27 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 06:16:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:11:02AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:38:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.124 release. > > > > There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun 09 Jun 2019 03:37:08 PM UTC. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'btrfs_add_link': > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6590:27: error: invalid initializer > > >    struct timespec64 now = current_time(&parent_inode->vfs_inode); > > >                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~ For 4.14 the type of "now" should be struct timespec. > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6592:35: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from type 'struct timespec64' > > >    parent_inode->vfs_inode.i_mtime = now; > > >                                    ^ > > > fs/btrfs/inode.c:6593:35: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'struct timespec' from type 'struct timespec64' > > >    parent_inode->vfs_inode.i_ctime = now; > > >                                    ^ > > > > What arch?  This builds for me here.  odd... > > > > arm, i386, m68k, mips, parisc, xtensa, ppc, sh4 > > It was originally seen with v4.14.123-69-gcc46c1204f89 last night, > but I confirmed that v4.14.123-70-g94c5316fb246 is still affected. All 32-bit architectures are affected; on 64-bit architectures timespec64 is a macro expanding to timespec. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Software Developer   Codethink Ltd https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom