Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 7 Jun 2019 19:20:23 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
Cc:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in
 hardware
Message-ID: <20190607172023.GL20269@zn.tnic>
References: <20190517193431.GI13482@zn.tnic>
 <SN6PR12MB2639C5427366AC3004C35CC0F80B0@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <20190517200225.GK13482@zn.tnic>
 <SN6PR12MB26390759DB43763D3A482918F8010@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <20190527232849.GC8209@cz.tnic>
 <SN6PR12MB263998ECCDF1E345FEB0869AF8100@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <20190607163723.GG20269@zn.tnic>
 <SN6PR12MB263968DE0DD98EBE14450698F8100@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <20190607165902.GJ20269@zn.tnic>
 <SN6PR12MB263905712C2375078012E833F8100@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR12MB263905712C2375078012E833F8100@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:08:04PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Right, I took that branch, squashed the locking fix into patch 2,
> fixed up the remaining patches, and then redid the last patch.
>
> I plan to send the result as a v4 of this patchset with all the links,
> version history, etc. Is that what you mean?

Yap, exactly!

> Sorry, if I misunderstood.

No worries, we're on the same page now :-)

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.