Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 7 Jun 2019 13:30:21 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc:     Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: xfs: Fix typo
Message-ID: <20190607133021.3a537e3a@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20190607183410.GF1871505@magnolia>
References: <20190509030549.2253-1-ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
        <20190607114415.32cb32dd@lwn.net>
        <20190607183410.GF1871505@magnolia>
Organization: LWN.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 11:34:10 -0700
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:

> I doubt the value of maintaining duplicate copies of this document in
> the kernel and the xfs documentation repo, and since the xfs docs and
> kernel licences aren't compatible maybe we should withdraw one...

Um .... the in-kernel docs say nothing about an incompatible license.  I
see only a GPL license at the repo you pointed to as well.  Is there
something I don't know going on here?  If the licenses aren't compatible
then those files shouldn't be there.

Thanks,

jon