Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp1054354ybi; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 01:16:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdf/MyR3NmsXtm/8CNEqXSxfvHCLLiV3UE3i8xnSjOd54w7LIAPtAfinN7ZJGY2Qg2hbPs X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8a87:: with SMTP id a7mr63534763pfc.53.1559981806590; Sat, 08 Jun 2019 01:16:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559981806; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mIeYkbZxmtSuPG7CmTaxEgiQujzdPDZP6/t4SyzgTELwh+yjCjhyOxdn6DiRrIXGVJ Y+2HxBpjQfwNZ2vvWvFEub0ifEnQiHLoWEQhGpi8BcQstmcBw22BKaZ3HtDOhYa9c+XB AhboaAgZHMfrK212p2ODB6bQnk6vF1LIgCdga27g0uO5/KbHwP4UClvFBb9jURO0wfJq 5WGjKVn4jR1IVju91AHouNxN+8BJG3Jack9hZn9dEYL91ExnDLGG4gS5M62ye9OHmehy xHAqwarYMqdkceWUXqAXq6+VRrUjxB1EQyL6rmeebWgAA8s4d2ozfEWjVQYfD4OVUzKN ROXg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=tHWAKOeFhbxqTWoTb1T6szenEnfDug4m6PHjchuPgI4=; b=qAEbwPFXV4HD05RwUPfG5pWOZdgXTJU5L+TioOSi+lNjUTW5xvEUp3B47oyqiWyOIe 10E75FzlV4tuQZG24mRujkp+lXRtWxJAghofNp8BWU7bPU9Wd0Wo614JaaSVgrz5UPPM ysmK0wcJ6uykcEvr45RjioPtc5Lh9CxQH8ZsIuYp8srO7uLOqAPuVchWPzwVQxjNkSLK Nxai5s1I/r990opM5ZskFqtetPbsOqWlrIq0l+yXjLQh0g/Ikd6XewTbtrqF/K5N8Fxp ECEGF8kmWSX1YdL3phcuBLjKfEGnd4nYyZr7cSs7eIMSQwebzxDs4wuibf/ntgrJYs8d +QAw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k12si4180051pgj.593.2019.06.08.01.16.29; Sat, 08 Jun 2019 01:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726319AbfFHIOa (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 8 Jun 2019 04:14:30 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:60567 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725809AbfFHIO3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jun 2019 04:14:29 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B4A7168C7B; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 10:14:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 10:14:00 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kashyap Desai Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Sebastian Ott , Sagi Grimberg , Max Gurtovoy , Bart Van Assche , Ulf Hansson , Alan Stern , Oliver Neukum , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "PDL,MEGARAIDLINUX" , PDL-MPT-FUSIONLINUX , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] megaraid_sas: set virt_boundary_mask in the scsi host Message-ID: <20190608081400.GA19573@lst.de> References: <20190605190836.32354-1-hch@lst.de> <20190605190836.32354-11-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 09:07:27PM +0530, Kashyap Desai wrote: > Hi Christoph, Changes for and looks good. We want > to confirm few sanity before ACK. BTW, what benefit we will see moving > virt_boundry setting to SCSI mid layer ? Is it just modular approach OR any > functional fix ? The big difference is that virt_boundary now also changes the max_segment_size, and this ensures that this limit is also communicated to the DMA mapping layer.