Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 00:13:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 00:13:08 -0400 Received: from swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.123]:35554 "EHLO swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 00:12:56 -0400 From: rwhron@earthlink.net Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 00:12:22 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Linux Test Project results on 2.4.10-ac7 Message-ID: <20011006001222.A5530@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Results from one test run: 10692 test cases PASS 12 test cases that FAIL in 2.4.10-ac4 now PASS (personality) 24 test cases FAIL This VFS message displayed on the console about 1 minute into the test: 2 0 2 0 476912 3744 15368 0 0 102 57 121 627 1 47 52 0 0 0 0 474128 5304 16364 0 0 197 337 146 252 1 9 90 VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer 0 0 0 0 462392 13304 19788 0 0 428 1030 178 192 2 3 95 1 0 0 0 462000 13304 20160 0 0 47 36 110 90 0 0 100 I/O --- These tests, as usual, cause the most noticeable delays in keyboard response. Keystrokes are not lost, but I can type several things in vim and it takes a few seconds for them to eventually blast on the display. At one point I looked at "top" during one of these pauses and saw kupdated and vim with D STAT. growfiles -b -e 1 -i 0 -L 120 -u -g 4090 -T 100 -t 408990 -l -C 10 -c 1000 -S 10 -f Lgf02_ growfiles -b -e 1 -i 0 -L 120 -u -g 5000 -T 100 -t 499990 -l -C 10 -c 1000 -S 10 -f Lgf03_ growfiles -b -e 1 -i 0 -L 120 -w -u -r 10-5000 -I r -T 10 -l -S 2 -f Lgf04_ This shows that all of the growfiles tests succeeded: Linux rushmore 2.4.10-ac7 948921 iterations on 41 files in 760 seconds Memory ------ Near the end of ltp, this test runs twice: Filling up 80% of ram which is 1177360793d bytes PASS ... 1177550848 bytes allocated. cmdline="mtest01 -p80" Both tests succeed at memory allocation. Interestingly, the swpd vmstat column stays large after the tests completes: procs memory swap io system cpu r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id 0 2 0 120 455316 17852 9132 0 0 0 2847 642 714 0 5 95 2 0 0 120 344976 61852 10268 0 0 148 6260 335 307 18 21 61 0 1 1 415424 1740 53168 2336 8 20256 10 20277 208 5032 54 26 20 1 0 0 118984 327592 53496 5548 506 77067 1076 77076 1314 16533 19 16 65 1 0 0 118984 322068 53796 11268 16 0 746 51 167 836 5 5 90 0 0 0 118984 321508 53796 11724 0 0 52 9 109 1460 0 72 27 0 0 0 118984 321480 53796 11752 0 0 4 17 103 77 0 1 99 0 0 0 118984 321480 53796 11752 0 0 0 12 103 69 0 0 100 0 0 0 118984 320596 53796 12420 23 0 107 5 118 86 0 0 100 Log notes --------- /var/log/messages file shows: Oct 5 23:16:29 rushmore modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module personality-1 Repeats 12 times for personalities 1-11 and 221 Note: 12 of 13 personality tests now PASS Oct 5 23:16:48 rushmore modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module net-pf-0 I thought the net-pf-0 module might be enabled by CONFIG_RTNETLINK, but perhaps it is something else: root@rushmore:/usr/src/linux# grep NETLINK .config CONFIG_NETLINK=y CONFIG_RTNETLINK=y CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV=y root@rushmore:/usr/src/linux# ls -l /dev/tap0 crw-r--r-- 1 root root 36, 16 Jul 23 03:28 /dev/tap0 Hardware: AMD Athlon 1333 512 Mb RAM IWill KK266 motherboard (via chipset) 1024 Mb swap Linux rushmore 2.4.10-ac7 #1 Fri Oct 5 22:56:36 EDT 2001 i686 unknown Gnu C 2.95.3 Gnu make 3.79.1 binutils 2.11 util-linux 2.11k mount 2.11k modutils 2.4.8 e2fsprogs 1.24a reiserfsprogs 3.x.0j PPP 2.4.1 Linux C Library 2.2.4 Dynamic linker (ldd) 2.2.4 Procps 2.0.7 Net-tools 1.60 Kbd 1.06 Sh-utils 2.0 Modules Loaded ppp_deflate bsd_comp ppp_async ipt_state ipt_limit ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat ip_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables All reiserfs filesystems Summary of FAIL tests execve06 1 FAIL : Execve fail, execve06, errno = 2 execve06 1 FAIL : Execve fail, execve06, errno = 2 execve06 1 FAIL : Execve fail, execve06, errno = 2 execve06 1 FAIL : Execve fail, execve06, errno = 2 execve06 1 FAIL : Execve fail, execve06, errno = 2 execve06 1 FAIL : Execve fail, execve06, errno = 2 execve06 1 FAIL : Execve fail, execve06, errno = 2 execve06 1 FAIL : Execve fail, execve06, errno = 2 fcntl07 3 FAIL : setreuid to user nobody failed, errno: 1 fcntl07 3 FAIL : child returned bad exit status personality02 1 FAIL : call failed - errno = 0 - Success pread02 2 FAIL : pread() returned 0, expected -1, errno:22 recv01 3 FAIL : invalid recv buffer ; returned 0 (expected -1), errno 88 (expected 14) setpgid03 2 FAIL : setpgid FAILED, expect EACCES got 1 shmdt02 1 FAIL : call succeeded unexpectedly vhangup01 1 FAIL : setreuid failed vhangup02 1 FAIL : vhangup() failed, errno:1 waitpid05 6 FAIL : signal error: core dump bit not set for exception number 3 waitpid05 9 FAIL : signal error: core dump bit not set for exception number 4 waitpid05 12 FAIL : signal error: core dump bit not set for exception number 5 waitpid05 15 FAIL : signal error: core dump bit not set for exception number 6 waitpid05 18 FAIL : signal error: core dump bit not set for exception number 8 waitpid05 23 FAIL : signal error: core dump bit not set for exception number 11 Thanks to the folks at the Linux Test Project: http://ltp.sf.net/ Thanks to all the kernel hackers. -- Randy Hron Linux News at http://lwn.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/