Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
        stable@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 076/241] ext4: do not delete unlinked inode from orphan list on failed truncate
Date:   Sun,  9 Jun 2019 18:40:18 +0200
Message-Id: <20190609164149.964444188@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190609164147.729157653@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20190609164147.729157653@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

commit ee0ed02ca93ef1ecf8963ad96638795d55af2c14 upstream.

It is possible that unlinked inode enters ext4_setattr() (e.g. if
somebody calls ftruncate(2) on unlinked but still open file). In such
case we should not delete the inode from the orphan list if truncate
fails. Note that this is mostly a theoretical concern as filesystem is
corrupted if we reach this path anyway but let's be consistent in our
orphan handling.

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -4944,7 +4944,7 @@ int ext4_setattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 			up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
 			ext4_journal_stop(handle);
 			if (error) {
-				if (orphan)
+				if (orphan && inode->i_nlink)
 					ext4_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
 				goto err_out;
 			}