Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp2511890ybi; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 13:41:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQ5GeAHiZ58GgxqjRTx7Enm/M2Z+0q7cZYWDIYc5xDN7Nrfxs1B5VBY+jAUN5eJXsqRgZW X-Received: by 2002:a63:6111:: with SMTP id v17mr12739855pgb.206.1560112895278; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 13:41:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560112895; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eT/8SN1pp1MmcnveWDr5I+XqobyGXcdr6EXEp1rMYU9W3Q7u8wHVYoC9CDXkvj1dji sUw0SJ7kiN1lE4rLhNjHwgCD8I4yrJcdgvCTllE5yPCxRbOTIU9LOYV8lZJbgnj0OjLw opNDpcx0waztz6kyUt90vlKCpuipvxbNcH5h/+NWG4Wsb0y6BvYfNu1V0B9kZ/pxBTKe cv5Dm722NCrQv6x7idGezTxOBEkRWYkK36KgBrAWFj071zPtVMaUaLn8JmI0Urj5IZAf j7NzDGPUfQq45kpCNu9O7WiD1zXmTXSz9xnV+cEHJBNMJTmjL7SPK7TCicwdYNGf0y3k RO3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=aAgxuie2Hz2Ygvh1FvKs8sfXSa5TA6FHsD2v2BeNmlU=; b=rwTejYwFpLaCjet7zxdWC+gCTomBDmC27ptJK925WLN+JQ+aD66cEkGxrjJlQrNy7u eRKjUEf3Id+B+wZE3dVZ6LfxqUs0tF/GigYvr8IV33242DjK+4EloGmTnNN2ttJfm4o+ rTTG2CV2pdiDZ+nKfvPDYJ6Q/8E+/kAQAk+ru3VbTMkKVm8ZnWybV6OXfGDnEI7Oczxy bIkGBWRZ4NdEqm42WNEsWbQxy0BWKojwEjYzuXYGmEKnCkuaBf7Wcb8GreZEQC8vtEgb XK7jAOLQZRwiZV0abZOefbZCWOe4jXOr41ybzJeaf0NtpKSrsfOjEh4dnNqu68kwxgRP pDqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@lunn.ch header.s=20171124 header.b=loFZ3wg+; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i14si8220017pgh.437.2019.06.09.13.41.19; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 13:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@lunn.ch header.s=20171124 header.b=loFZ3wg+; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730236AbfFIUik (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 Jun 2019 16:38:40 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:39560 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725933AbfFIUij (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2019 16:38:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aAgxuie2Hz2Ygvh1FvKs8sfXSa5TA6FHsD2v2BeNmlU=; b=loFZ3wg+RZyrJP5WO6P8HV8ypt gJzwviy22tCzfN56o6PocZ5VpSRqs864Mo6i6I+Uw8bhxw/vrbHap1giCG/rTkFt64tRsLPv8TE/L pPNZIwacKiE8RFy8kheg+N5BzbBM0mDbgETBoA9ACUsBkqJgg0bAHswXQXmQ2g7Xzl9k=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ha4aC-0002PI-Ik; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 22:38:28 +0200 Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 22:38:28 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Martin Blumenstingl Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, narmstrong@baylibre.com, khilman@baylibre.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC next v1 2/5] gpio: of: parse stmmac PHY reset line specific active-low property Message-ID: <20190609203828.GA8247@lunn.ch> References: <20190609180621.7607-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> <20190609180621.7607-3-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190609180621.7607-3-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 08:06:18PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > The stmmac driver currently ignores the GPIO flags which are passed via > devicetree because it operates with legacy GPIO numbers instead of GPIO > descriptors. Hi Martin I don't think this is the reason. I think historically stmmac messed up and ignored the flags. There are a number of device tree blobs which have the incorrect flag value, but since it was always ignored, it did not matter. Then came along a board which really did need the flag, but it was too late, it could not be enabled because too many boards would break. So the hack was made, and snps,reset-active-low was added. Since snps,reset-active-low is a hack, it should not be in the core. Please don't add it to gpiolib-of.c, keep it within stmmac driver. Andrew