Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [RFC V3] mm: Generalize and rename notify_page_fault() as
 kprobe_page_fault()
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
References: <1559903655-5609-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
 <6e095842-0f7f-f428-653d-2b6e98fea6b3@intel.com>
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Message-ID: <bc8e2140-dc78-ce99-a336-91733c2fda67@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:06:34 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6e095842-0f7f-f428-653d-2b6e98fea6b3@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 06/07/2019 08:36 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/7/19 3:34 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> +static nokprobe_inline bool kprobe_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> +					      unsigned int trap)
>> +{
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * To be potentially processing a kprobe fault and to be allowed
>> +	 * to call kprobe_running(), we have to be non-preemptible.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (kprobes_built_in() && !preemptible() && !user_mode(regs)) {
>> +		if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, trap))
>> +			ret = 1;
>> +	}
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
> 
> Nits: Other that taking the nice, readable, x86 one and globbing it onto
> a single line, looks OK to me.  It does seem a _bit_ silly to go to the
> trouble of converting to 'bool' and then using 0/1 and an 'int'
> internally instead of true/false and a bool, though.  It's also not a

Changing to 'bool'...

> horrible thing to add a single line comment to this sucker to say:
> 
> /* returns true if kprobes handled the fault */
> 

Picking this in-code comment.

> In any case, and even if you don't clean any of this up:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> 

Thanks !