Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:33:33 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To:     Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@gmail.com>
Cc:     devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu,
        florian.c.schilhabel@googlemail.com, tiny.windzz@gmail.com,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        colin.king@canonical.com, larry.finger@lwfinger.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8712: r8712_setdatarate_cmd(): Change
Message-ID: <20190610143333.GA1915@kadam>
References: <20190607140658.11932-1-nishkadg.linux@gmail.com>
 <20190607141548.GP31203@kadam>
 <98b587c9-df5b-0905-ab8f-69a4bae296b0@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <98b587c9-df5b-0905-ab8f-69a4bae296b0@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:02:27AM +0530, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> On 07/06/19 7:45 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Probably you sent this patch unintentionally.  The subject doesn't make
> > any sort of sense.  :P
> 
> So the problem with the subject line is that git send-email and vim (as
> configured on my laptop) tend to line-wrap even the subject line. Since I
> have two patches that do the same thing for different functions, I felt I
> should have the driver and the function name in the subject line (to avoid
> confusion between the patches and to allow for easy searching later). But
> that doesn't leave enough space in the subject line for "Change return
> values/type" or any other descriptive message. What should I do?
> 

I don't really care.

[PATCH] staging: rtl8712: clean up r8712_setdatarate_cmd() return type

regards,
dan carpenter