Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp3524718ybi; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:43:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqylwy+kW0r+owblP3HInNWcbQC8SFHIBDIn3IGTn1Xouke5iH/JahbW24YGkEKbqJKms+M8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:d8a:: with SMTP id bg10mr22771669pjb.92.1560192232101; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:43:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560192232; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IF4wthrid0DYC+esNmTF8prKb2rrzv5/raPeWD65pudcnyCTe+dhnhFaAVqJzSa++g r6LJoA/JIALkFt2tIWpNzpQ2MEGCrxC/o2tvPgCRMWRfYjtcyr4bnAiyGADSJuK8P80u kBebMGbsHrS88rGKW79qedz3tKgK2DEpRA9dcRCep2Rr4rfQF8go2Vj4M6g1ireOwkPd cMEOYB+b07fP8q4zXCcUvko6/9Di/hQ4ixrzNEoYrtyiZ/Y9zMtjtxICkmePl9n4LtA8 EPzxQV6XXV6YtZe422WoDqHFyMwvsl7/GdMx2gE0ghyEjzOedtdQJxxns7XG3Ic9NE34 JZ+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :date:dkim-signature; bh=xzF3r86W97egQVuRRZN7XxfOK5GJ24BFLPdiGeWYCVI=; b=gdMIqLnij2Bn0ftiflhN/ZTzS9TDNMV81yUL3umnGZS3/+5S3KWdwQTaN0GAn8h6+k f2cZ5H+M8/bRvvFincvDay93SGaAiRc/gcCGbSXqrwjBsafVfiPqHzbQ87B1Jt0xUkhz Ao/lt7OoTw/u/wOM8xTgfwC+IALixjn9iAE318B3m/7M5N3iKktpXFeMpMOQgIts94Un cShLv8XY7L6h3lcWtzWPRWV1CRo9ZyxjUz0MCbcBogDpI5urWlbQfqDH2PHDUsIP+WF3 8+/m/VuUqLsHkJmN/Wg4GkIkqekNaaJvOLvf6AvpWEbMWT5VPS86N/cZ2dz2vjAZxh5/ 91Yw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=T+2B8rw+; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a129si10835314pfb.222.2019.06.10.11.43.37; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=T+2B8rw+; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388680AbfFJSmL (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:42:11 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:45147 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387398AbfFJSmL (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:42:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1560192115; bh=LzLdNJrbzUCDS7PCDwpFLmd0iw050qkVQJEPday38fg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=T+2B8rw+wFDI62cOXNgr1keh8ye6qAewVzl3gb3hXwpSaaXTDknCK3GxYXQ62XW9y 9u+j82xYUgojpQsDf/uTxeP2hb4kwwqXqUOxYpVeU9eF+uUs+bUL5ifFfbJMz5TwFw yvH7x8bXF9nVXWRGLj/KPRsPjvZ5yksn36jbG4Pk= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [10.215.76.8] ([46.142.197.184]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N1wpt-1gYn9u2281-012GvT; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:41:55 +0200 Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:42:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Johannes Schindelin X-X-Sender: dscho@DESKTOP-QUA364F.localdomain To: "Randall S. Becker" cc: 'Junio C Hamano' , git@vger.kernel.org, 'Linux Kernel' , git-packagers@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <018b01d51f90$4d394c10$e7abe430$@nexbridge.com> Message-ID: References: <018b01d51f90$4d394c10$e7abe430$@nexbridge.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:vJx6lKycpiLSsjCyZ30KQQ7UNmBkywfaza/lkxvDGoINNNcgmAL GeZ01Xaq9mnHKs8aBbDyUIxyyca2BNtLlUkpT23NNnA9dZXgKaCCip3ONKqH6TGTAhgeP3D xPFQ3b6LGsuPMdfj2idXPYlbmRgym3NKmOm+OGM5bE4Zfj7uz2b8SMvv/rgfqUppyEDM/Hq kzOrAcS8GOiF4uf6iZEdA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:97PPFUdxvRs=:hxIQKvvh3fkvLd28jWQ9JF fnIPnVE0hBkgzzk88p9KzFdy/1t3tkR/FXAMJp7MQ5PxEfuWH2dszPRdtK7u2TMFKOMc46TEW W1QH1dwQcOT+XcpqIQz4aOBgTZyRR9XUGISQ/x2Je9mV9nMpP9Ld5l79iHLuQppjPt7ilVwgT UoA0PrVYFKgrAuYl+ISjSdCGd3phy3VohzxEJ4XJnxgFKUPcEijr+R84SmcSSTM7jJ+nQdnjK YSbOs3LO0lbeoasnw+LgsOimtksfrX/NuVUFs0o6lGISNIZMQSJaVCgUP1dsy1nV01HghEgJV BwcCMVBGG41E7DbDiEziGDTHAJraIrdLmO5Av1gQ8R5AuRlAP2n2FEnWZ4FEkC8Kkh56revbR mCO2ooJNPNZhH86A2u5CPxVqhLEWHFGygiE4zZtSVFe88McH7JBAHrizBOMl4arOpLm16AHzz 8kN2iVQ/nMytqC/fKfbcWYN1T6+TwW5+8g/hj7cf/mYDx5QdtBujpgde6ebJd7B6GYuMYQhRW rdaUitqufVMeFyt0cwoMry0PBhJtMEcLuiTtzXZZgO0eNDBMELcKb6lPBRI9Xp2SWhA6GnpVt +gsVjzOWvXmNpYQFwJZxw4yJdpxG8bqh00UGNdnG8LBPSZkIt/oG5eEdbBpeAvylmmZbB2WGe wNUGT5A0ST2rA9wes1uCHmkgz0l2CKBam7znlF5GcVLbOyVexMlwxQZK4Mz5VgeqyAtRfPnsQ t8OumBQkQ4POXaTyc4Gz2OlICMZVhy41o58gqqjye72/NDSUpHx2sGMU686BvY9sk/7ZRXRfA U9fC+K5NjD31Wwzpn8w/jaN8ToV6+4WxbfBGuBlcu3xkKThskIneg7As8jsGcsjKQYIFvPxMq vyUwKbcYND7XtcEFhWEc88pSr1xmJcJJBDlLo5wcwiwz7KBcaV/2evC63/WfP8UQfYetY1V5V fYa3vGm428YkEmKba0YIwGaxb15Own6vJdcHGxoQWaLejdj9r2i3Q Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Randall, On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Randall S. Becker wrote: > On Friday, June 7, 2019 5:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > The latest feature release Git v2.22.0 is now available at the > > usual places. It is comprised of 745 non-merge commits since > > v2.21.0, contributed by 74 people, 18 of which are new faces. > > Report from NonStop tests: > t7519 subtest 25 still fails on first execution but not on second. As mentioned previously: known issue. The patch to fix that is in `next` (1aa850bc59 (Merge branch 'js/fsmonitor-unflake' into next, 2019-05-30). > t9001 subtests 33, 82, 118, 119, 146 fail. We have no normal sendmail on= platform. Maybe you should craft a patch series that adds a new prereq that verifies that sendmail works, and contribute a patch that marks those test cases with that prereq. > t9020, t9600, t9601, t9602 all fail - we have no SVN. I may be able to > handle exclusions for the next release. The question is why they fail even if the correspondig prereq should have triggered. Another opportunity for you to contribute a patch series! (By my analysis, you rank #277 in the `git shortlog -nse --no-merges` statistics, and just 17 patches would improve your rank to #150 or better...) > So essentially, no change from previous releases other than t7519 being > wonky. This is a pass. Thanks for all hard work from the team. Yes, t7519 became "more wonky" as a consequence of a bug fix of mine that made that particular bug a lot more prominent. So prominent, in fact, that I contributed two patches that will improve my rank ;-) Ciao, Johannes