Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp3631546ybi;
        Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8hIzxu5qj7pVCXZy5Us8IyHFGuBzLdScREtILeAeguoe7z/ZGZpVrVLgWY9ggbbvacpew
X-Received: by 2002:a63:fe51:: with SMTP id x17mr16988946pgj.339.1560199578136;
        Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560199578; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=I+zl0BTMm9VljbCeGVV+T035Wp7yl5bd+wlAU30NcvDnQj8kMlLh1m/N94D2sjXbMZ
         U9UPA28sMXJ+yFqq7sJbUpxCZETum/ae4zBbvNJzPCCu5TpUa6ZCaLbfYut1vRJ90taI
         hCmEkL3LVZhoVo3T+1a5nO1MBJjMZ0obQArlws9c8TKc40MV4gD+M+EDgEN58hvVfjCk
         83n8U/1zvdgOk7vkpiQmk+hAruWlsggidn9tDWYEzCli/L38DPPCnNG7FGLMPV4gN0bQ
         pebPmAEfmCZla32SJY2HEBDXqxk0PjE66fxJ+Pu68tO0zT/tNLuvzlKVIMlAMOoRmM5v
         AKJQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to
         :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc
         :to:from:date:dkim-signature;
        bh=hlmUNHoiHkJzfeU+nJMbHqheqLLNl/iO4bbpxBa8I0k=;
        b=l8ppl46KmX899eJjNXUUZu9whfWHlvJKEBldlUxNysEmpXT5r7+wBj+HOicEbGe4te
         ejsJhJP1VzTMPnM7K2rjBOlNWsIGGDizKrxi0Mq4EqaYAWZoCnoGT0HdCqGpkn4DK7I+
         WrG4mFlp2vHlCG+vjG6DE+nSp22fIGdvZyYFxe45omr4hMHAj7wN4Xe7s720guk0Ljea
         A/RSyNrEkrMAJ7mvhJhm+I0oHFBHhNIBjrfoNQ2OVtWjRtACuiN6t+viCgn4GxOQmaWH
         kht/IX9ienh/o2zXfbs3nSTvfC1vkXR+XenEAw0d9EoqKdeVWddIrI7Lzb710eRrrRIi
         2Odg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=zTYSn31R;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 123si11755429pfz.150.2019.06.10.13.46.03;
        Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=zTYSn31R;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2389787AbfFJUp0 (ORCPT <rfc822;fezhang.suse@gmail.com>
        + 99 others); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:45:26 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55348 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S2389331AbfFJUp0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:45:26 -0400
Received: from gmail.com (unknown [104.132.1.77])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEBBC206E0;
        Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:45:25 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=default; t=1560199526;
        bh=Sl6eccgIpGpXLNppse+kSAkAyOn3m0wVLWUt3obSHyU=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
        b=zTYSn31RcPA2WX6cjULsR/Ho2AraR/emd9uyH0WKJSCC3pPJPEjKnW/TePvawiJLE
         bLkMs32JvmlgZiogJd0HU6hbOkJrDAoCR333d/pCsLMdzCiRSUQ1Q7KPNx5qdgTwUS
         P/1zaXfSy7L902vw2AQhy2pSYKjiB+AEG/SmISFo=
Date:   Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:45:24 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+e5579222b6a3edd96522@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        dasaratharaman.chandramouli@intel.com, dledford@redhat.com,
        leon@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, parav@mellanox.com,
        roland@purestorage.com, sean.hefty@intel.com,
        syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: WARNING: bad unlock balance in ucma_event_handler
Message-ID: <20190610204523.GK63833@gmail.com>
References: <000000000000af6530056e863794@google.com>
 <20180613170543.GB30019@ziepe.ca>
 <20190610184853.GG63833@gmail.com>
 <20190610194732.GH18468@ziepe.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190610194732.GH18468@ziepe.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:47:32PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> There are many unfixed syzkaller bugs in rdma_cm, so I'm not surprised
> it is still happening..
> 
> Nobody has stepped forward to work on this code, and it is not a
> simple mess to understand, let alone try to fix.
> 

But people still use it, right?  Do they not care that it's spewing syzbot
reports?  Are they depending on the kernel to provide any security properties?

- Eric