Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp4131614ybi; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 01:17:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyHGgbXlf5FRbIYd7Wnt0/0W5pNOObwwLPdtQ5+hb0NOdiPHuGr1+jNliD/0rQCLbxky6vv X-Received: by 2002:a63:6c87:: with SMTP id h129mr19735938pgc.427.1560241072373; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 01:17:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560241072; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e4r4RBbOCnveOEqhApQxS4zlvAErzKFrvsRkgDy3Lw3lsCogFLaMsaTHPSNAneprMM ZI98xdKR8nl6Thsfo84O14gm7q3sBuYq2XfRGt14qS2xJIqGVbhAvVAiT3vJ7AalzhYb 6okfjxJdka6y49bhrGD+G6bPDdikuvker6Xsn66+YfpDDJCPE2KiwiGyA3p8FT3JAoNu hlIr+3inz7oFBkmxv01FfQiCIHPeV9Rf7XFelDUgJHE8D52TLvLFnoUiUf+aAD3HNBXE AeEkPoXC2HM1poG1tHRByemgpB2cLr+nfXHBhG2B1VtM8UDncKf40Et6uzP+aG+YZztM TpCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=v+wQ/tTAoUpcN8ai0R3uFbgMJw7DJIFOY20V+zQbQ+4=; b=ce6P1/skVEmaHH83JxjpJALmeBWYEkcx0H9+C493r4yt6T0ve3XVtLwJjha/iJiDf7 Yoe6SDL1xRs3W0vetcHlKIBqodH/QRSXIpuMByozW7JuEPsn8oSiOodpFbCJrQhiqlsb iYxKn+alzLnav+OsBUiYbXonyvn62WTJNL97FgxFqfsBMBdVN416DRrZMfoR8JzmuevR uFgIBCWwd+ROWs0w4Wa6U4jP6MuWwoXGRyRdILbyBHD2xpamC9+wQ4/JhjF//TQ88Hqh uvxhFg8fRwb76zA0bozDZSSgFLevdwOqbEB9zg8DNYb9D11NgN8zW+jrBgLQCJztqQFe qMYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f7si11477691pgv.105.2019.06.11.01.17.37; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 01:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404709AbfFKIQs (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 04:16:48 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:54866 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404250AbfFKIQs (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 04:16:48 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4372B337; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 01:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.29.141] (e121487-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.29.141]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE1693F73C; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] riscv: add binfmt_flat support To: Christoph Hellwig , Greg Ungerer Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Michal Simek , linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20190610212015.9157-1-hch@lst.de> <20190610212015.9157-16-hch@lst.de> From: Vladimir Murzin Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:16:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190610212015.9157-16-hch@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/10/19 10:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Use the generic support with arguments are on the stack. Same as arm > and m68k. Out of curiosity, what is reason for keeping arguments on the stack? ARM port of uClibc has following comment around manipulating of argv/argc: /* * uClinux/arm stacks look a little different from normal * MMU-full Linux/arm stacks (for no good reason) */ So I though it is kind of legacy. Thanks Vladimir > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 ++ > arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 + > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index 0c4b12205632..2e3b60cdeef4 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ config RISCV > select OF > select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE > select OF_IRQ > + select ARCH_HAS_BINFMT_FLAT > select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS > + select BINFMT_FLAT_ARGVP_ENVP_ON_STACK > select CLONE_BACKWARDS > select COMMON_CLK > select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild > index 5ee646619cc3..1efaeddf1e4b 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ generic-y += compat.h > generic-y += device.h > generic-y += div64.h > generic-y += extable.h > +generic-y += flat.h > generic-y += dma.h > generic-y += dma-contiguous.h > generic-y += dma-mapping.h >