Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
To:     <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
        <jmorris@namei.org>, <serge@hallyn.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] ima: Make arch_policy_entry static
Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:40:32 +0800
Message-ID: <20190611134032.14656-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Fix sparse warning:

security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:202:23: warning:
 symbol 'arch_policy_entry' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 1cc822a..cd1b728 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
 };
 
 /* An array of architecture specific rules */
-struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
+static struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
 
 static LIST_HEAD(ima_default_rules);
 static LIST_HEAD(ima_policy_rules);
-- 
2.7.4