Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:41:06 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To:     Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/mm: show TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC warning if the
 cache size is over the spec.
Message-ID: <20190611154105.GE10165@c02tf0j2hf1t.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <20190611151731.6135-1-msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
 <20190611151731.6135-3-msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190611151731.6135-3-msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:17:31AM -0400, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Show the warning and taints as TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC if the cache line
> size is greater than the maximum.

In general the "out of spec" part is a misnomer, we tend to apply it to
CPU features that are not supported by the kernel rather than some CPU
feature not compliant with the architecture (we call the latter errata).

I suggest you drop this patch.

-- 
Catalin