Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp4629715ybi; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:43:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzzkLpD7YiCaKEVww6U0n/oeFPAQnRmN/WPnE5auM1sdz1THNeXoDdaKmqg4dxHXyRekKsY X-Received: by 2002:a62:f20b:: with SMTP id m11mr28863317pfh.125.1560271388760; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:43:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560271388; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VvLJ/V3HzAo4tsHXaGoYjWKNGn0id23kk9DudHL5OMcMe87vgLnLrlff8JIPFoA6T8 yEkRlnR84hWsGNyDNxyLtUPk+6USMoUkokKP9WhcOs+KYWbjhsERl7RE16YjDlodvnwB WRp6qN7106dNLk1Hzn6dMQ81XEMPiLkw8tN8Wtrfsw5XxTIqbW75HKoqS5gTYIhT06bj 158jjCimnFenDdER22Hkkl3m2fOZ/gpH+ppnq5Hsvj68JCHwA5P/svkl+fMYkfDWkqN1 DoBM3pHYr3cNaXowBDmFdSBxRmAlxfe2JGobwVCiC1TH8OKY0YsQPnftTnvqvYnstEdW cuJQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=bcA/91IYPAAvb4g4z6GfhMqIAguhcnOKFLYNErGDNdI=; b=yhFsJgJLFhgLYaNufXCffJiBFA9I81+6DERLz2xlXkSq++W34K9v5Hg9AfzeXSJB1W eRbxsmdUreR0ptjhOTBAKpP5bmZRH0Hd6VSB0tmtyZdKGkJQkjOZiu0GktrA+CoxLGAt 5kjB0dtPN04KDcA8zNB2n/ErkqOnFTWI3+7qlnpWQ3r7qweejssZsjYfRCgOj5UyOvXr SFAG723vBCwrhiST9AQI3RxPYs39kjfwemoRTitJb83Ez2z/kIt9chTWeTtBuqQfGIwW Mc+4VYeauerjx0rDJf73Vg+Fm5wktDiJe+qs2zmU8BlcTniuTVc7KID0mVRkVWDW9Vgk D2qA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cj19si13868540plb.169.2019.06.11.09.42.53; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405437AbfFKPru (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:47:50 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:36418 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405425AbfFKPru (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:47:50 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FB8337; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fuggles.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BED713F246; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 08:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:47:46 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] linux/bits.h: make BIT(), GENMASK(), and friends available in assembly Message-ID: <20190611154746.GF4324@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20190527083412.26651-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <20190527083412.26651-2-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190527083412.26651-2-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+86 (6f28e57d73f2) () Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 05:34:11PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > BIT(), GENMASK(), etc. are useful to define register bits of hardware. > However, low-level code is often written in assembly, where they are > not available due to the hard-coded 1UL, 0UL. > > In fact, in-kernel headers such as arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > use _BITUL() instead of BIT() so that the register bit macros are > available in assembly. > > Using macros in include/uapi/linux/const.h have two reasons: > > [1] For use in uapi headers > We should use underscore-prefixed variants for user-space. > > [2] For use in assembly code > Since _BITUL() does not use hard-coded 1UL, it can be used as an > alternative of BIT(). > > For [2], it is pretty easy to change BIT() etc. for use in assembly. > > This allows to replace _BUTUL() in kernel headers with BIT(). > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- > > include/linux/bits.h | 17 ++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Acked-by: Will Deacon Will