Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp5208608ybi; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:48:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw0mQnVy/kLaqT85eDtRd0e5TMvDiopzYJtn33NeuCJzlo31A1jCYVpe6919VuofculzQon X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ad86:: with SMTP id s6mr6115008pjq.42.1560314933032; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:48:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560314933; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YufXv9THFD+/YnUUW5c8FSwT4WEf67OS2TUhf4EXWYBieqOr0xdlq+ka831r7JoK95 bWT0jWQLDMh3QGPO21EDHebRjSFOVv246Dm/HKSKJ8lPRWtGlzzmsl4f4fzlP8rNEC4/ eAamYWAufAtX7Q1HRV8kKq24E4uCTLVjaUESrfWPWiVeCprn46QjM6rj52edaFPQ1wTU MuCEBq8tSS9A4Kl7vCu00d5fuE/kQJAgPJWzmlM9tOG6YhekTAHbTbZfkJCmyg8h1K49 UNWSoy7DGarCk/D5L4dR7AbPtc+CphvMTLzjJULhAKrYkTRsFA9qb4y8UvNw8c2H0bSy nJWw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-id:user-agent:content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to :references:message-id:date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=RYlqfgTDbNmEATouxYpaVla38xRVYG5Congtrf73+1o=; b=ncq/HZlDQNLtCh9Z02DijkurQCcVRenf2SG/u3F+Dpl66NXTOUN5MYq9MWG12yDxDn cNS+oLlSLQIsyOolgR1RTC0l6RbSDRxkMuZxftXFAYndSB9kKH6fMQiRjCc0dSdShTZj YbGG3/MeNt5pJJ1ddCf/nqLn/jNTPZyjBEOuQTjME7yo5uLkeTaEIJl8JerAEp8kS0zo IrxJqDC2Skluhdral9WxXsf86SdSoeSHvnLB/vk7mVIkYG0MNfOXG8GD71YQq8ThORED tFiX0RcuDUEt23yCsv+zKWus5VbHVD1ocxdEjEtWfxH8ggKyfVV4DcLJT/Ueui84DvZ8 tq7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@wavesemi.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-wavesemi-onmicrosoft-com header.b=bSN5Qv5Y; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x9si14454451pln.364.2019.06.11.21.48.38; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@wavesemi.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-wavesemi-onmicrosoft-com header.b=bSN5Qv5Y; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436724AbfFKWEs (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:04:48 -0400 Received: from mail-eopbgr770120.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.77.120]:27206 "EHLO NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405561AbfFKWEr (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:04:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wavesemi.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-wavesemi-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=RYlqfgTDbNmEATouxYpaVla38xRVYG5Congtrf73+1o=; b=bSN5Qv5YSvd9+5EgL9ykIQUh0XEkVudovlLAWegWn8FiPwPdPTGX+YMxg67feOZjNK4tQhzVT2GgZ/Ms3GhVjv1AktIPSgUERg6IX4BvK15tD4oep2ozZFh9HGqECkjRenZUj38gP6O/Bz2rwdlDlleqJAGi6VAaypNeVUrqRXk= Received: from MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (10.172.60.12) by MWHPR2201MB1232.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (10.174.160.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1987.11; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 22:04:43 +0000 Received: from MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6975:b632:c85b:9e40]) by MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6975:b632:c85b:9e40%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1987.010; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 22:04:43 +0000 From: Paul Burton To: Linus Walleij CC: Paul Cercueil , Andrew Morton , Ralf Baechle , James Hogan , "od@zcrc.me" , "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , stable Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: lb60: Fix pin mappings Thread-Topic: [PATCH] MIPS: lb60: Fix pin mappings Thread-Index: AQHVGvNR1qZ4gQD8hE2mZTClh06Tw6aQxdgAgADKEACAADlIgIAFREAA Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 22:04:43 +0000 Message-ID: <20190611220441.2u4udxfmyjcdio65@pburton-laptop> References: <20190604163311.19059-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <1559988846.1815.1@crapouillou.net> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BYAPR08CA0040.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:117::17) To MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:18::12) user-agent: NeoMutt/20180716 authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pburton@wavecomp.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [12.94.197.246] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b14cf263-0b25-40c6-8647-08d6eeb8cec8 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020);SRVR:MWHPR2201MB1232; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR2201MB1232: x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2 x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000; x-forefront-prvs: 006546F32A x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(7916004)(346002)(39840400004)(366004)(136003)(396003)(376002)(189003)(199004)(2906002)(54906003)(6116002)(58126008)(229853002)(44832011)(256004)(33716001)(6486002)(316002)(3846002)(71190400001)(71200400001)(1076003)(6436002)(99286004)(478600001)(6506007)(386003)(66066001)(102836004)(486006)(4326008)(76176011)(6916009)(25786009)(6246003)(186003)(966005)(68736007)(81156014)(8676002)(81166006)(8936002)(5660300002)(26005)(9686003)(305945005)(14454004)(52116002)(446003)(7736002)(6306002)(11346002)(6512007)(73956011)(66556008)(66946007)(66446008)(66476007)(476003)(64756008)(42882007)(53936002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:MWHPR2201MB1232;H:MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: wavecomp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ex1oY5d4bn9ob86Bk/ikGdn2i4Fow9qCN3KbfemaFa7IQMfSFyN5aIJFMHUR/yLHVf8GDl/80AyFXpNLnqTH3eAGoh5nIWXJNBjC0yypP3gi6wwCL5shrRfOLPv6420BM+trItsYe/cK4OpaFf+g1QvuDZbjVzTUidZCibreA2Sty0YH3BrBkPFzKrc/WwS7FCkGDckkaHJ3GW094/Ga4DdQqRDGlPnKbTAeKU5CXjIhG55w3ZOGo+7gk1Mw2rgqC/56DoQyoJORNpeIaITO0K2EQCr7LuEoDOjNMOo3hsu7fUn45++JL6lM6xj6TKNo9n756jZcoNcWkgdv6gMb2Yk9cmcQ8Qk/5ao38qQy+Egpl/lYX340phVsCLYeln3ZmLeJR6JlElXB9/oRvlvVfMsXyXUugpnk/kWnLQFSGbI= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <292DA4A93A9B544C8AA0339A409B757D@namprd22.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: mips.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b14cf263-0b25-40c6-8647-08d6eeb8cec8 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jun 2019 22:04:43.5669 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 463607d3-1db3-40a0-8a29-970c56230104 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: pburton@wavecomp.com X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR2201MB1232 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus / Paul, On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 03:39:07PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > Yes, that's definitely what's planned; right now the blockers are > > patchsets [1] and [2]. [1] is ignored by everybody because there's no > > maintainer for drivers/memory/. [2] is a year-long effort that still > > doesn't show me the light at the end of the tunnel. > > > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/4/743 > > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/21/679 >=20 > What? That's unacceptable, the last resort is usually to send the > patches to Andrew Morton (whether fair or not) when nothing gets > applied. >=20 > In this case I would however encourage the MIPS maintainer to > simply queue this stuff in the MIPS tree as blocking his arch work > if not merged, Ralf would you consider just queueing this? > I do not think the other Linus would mind. I'd be happy to queue up [1] in mips-next, it looks pretty innocuous. I can definitely feel Paul's pain on [2], but I see v12 is still getting feedback so... Thanks, Paul