DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=ms2.inr.ac.ru;
  b=YYGh6g+cJfv0uxVYwclDvu6/hvMQIMOohLBhlUs/Ss0wHSBZ6AZTDIK3+qhxL6gR7jgcRDMb3jp6ebdIIz8XQLY2vvwTyOUYxct/vvmSxccpa/jLbrKSMtjpEVmK8L8yFzwMPSsd2Mqjl0yfZVaFD+oP3SII5bEKzUCvRYgiEyo=;
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:35:49 +0300
From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Christopher Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: netlink nlmsg_pid supposed to be pid or tid?
Message-ID: <20051121213549.GA28187@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
References: <438220C3.4040602@nortel.com> <E1EeIcx-0006i3-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1EeIcx-0006i3-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 472
Lines: 13

Hello!

> I tend to agree with you here that tgid makes more sense.

I agree, apparently netlink_autobind was missed when sed'ing pid->tgid.
Of course, it does not matter, but tgid is nicer choice from user's viewpoint.

Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/