Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:05:18 -0400
From:   Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, ashok.raj@intel.com,
        jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, alan.cox@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
        mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        pengfei.xu@intel.com, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] swiotlb: Zero out bounce buffer for untrusted
 device
Message-ID: <20190612010518.GB22479@char.us.oracle.com>
References: <20190603011620.31999-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <20190603011620.31999-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <20190610154553.GT28796@char.us.oracle.com>
 <ec6ac2ba-7b88-2bcf-aa95-f8981b258c5c@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ec6ac2ba-7b88-2bcf-aa95-f8981b258c5c@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 08:43:40AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> Thanks a lot for your reviewing.
> 
> On 6/10/19 11:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 09:16:14AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > This is necessary to avoid exposing valid kernel data to any
> > > milicious device.
> > 
> > malicious
> 
> Yes, thanks.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >   kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 6 ++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > > index f956f785645a..ed41eb7f6131 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> > >   #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> > >   #include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
> > >   #include <linux/set_memory.h>
> > > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > >   #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > >   #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > >   #endif
> > > @@ -560,6 +561,11 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
> > >   	 */
> > >   	for (i = 0; i < nslots; i++)
> > >   		io_tlb_orig_addr[index+i] = orig_addr + (i << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> > > +
> > > +	/* Zero out the bounce buffer if the consumer is untrusted. */
> > > +	if (dev_is_untrusted(hwdev))
> > > +		memset(phys_to_virt(tlb_addr), 0, alloc_size);
> > 
> > What if the alloc_size is less than a PAGE? Should this at least have ALIGN or such?
> 
> It's the consumer (iommu subsystem) who requires this to be page
> aligned. For swiotlb, it just clears out all data in the allocated
> bounce buffer.

I am thinking that the if you don't memset the full page the malicious hardware could read stale date from the rest of the page
that hasn't been cleared?

> 
> Best regards,
> Baolu
> 
> > 
> > > +
> > >   	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> > >   	    (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
> > >   		swiotlb_bounce(orig_addr, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.17.1
> > > 
> >