Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:46:00 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc:     Simon =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sandstr=F6m?= <simon@nikanor.nu>,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: kpc2000: remove unnecessary comments in
 kp2000_pcie_probe
Message-ID: <20190612074600.GA17100@kroah.com>
References: <20190610200535.31820-1-simon@nikanor.nu>
 <20190610200535.31820-3-simon@nikanor.nu>
 <20190612073936.GD1915@kadam>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20190612073936.GD1915@kadam>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:39:36AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:05:35PM +0200, Simon Sandstr?m wrote:
> > @@ -349,9 +340,7 @@ static int kp2000_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >  		goto err_remove_ida;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Step 4: Setup the Register BAR
> > -	 */
> > +	// Setup the Register BAR
> 
> Greg, are we moving the C++ style comments?  Linus is fine with them.  I
> don't like them but whatever...

I don't like them either.  I'm only "ok" with them on the very first
line of the file.  Linus chose // to make it "stand out" from the normal
flow of the file, which is fine for an SPDX line.  So putting these in
here like this is not ok to me.

thanks,

greg k-h