Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:12:43 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc:     jpoimboe@redhat.com, jikos@kernel.org, joe.lawrence@redhat.com,
        kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] stacktrace: Remove weak version of
 save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable()
Message-ID: <20190612081243.4pnj4bqpy4xto6nf@pathway.suse.cz>
References: <20190611141320.25359-1-mbenes@suse.cz>
 <20190611141320.25359-2-mbenes@suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190611141320.25359-2-mbenes@suse.cz>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170912 (1.9.0)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue 2019-06-11 16:13:18, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> Recent rework of stack trace infrastructure introduced a new set of
> helpers for common stack trace operations (commit e9b98e162aa5
> ("stacktrace: Provide helpers for common stack trace operations") and
> related). As a result, save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() is not directly
> called anywhere. Livepatch, currently the only user of the reliable
> stack trace feature, now calls stack_trace_save_tsk_reliable().
> 
> When CONFIG_HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE is set and depending on
> CONFIG_ARCH_STACKWALK, stack_trace_save_tsk_reliable() calls either
> arch_stack_walk_reliable() or mentioned save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable().
> x86_64 defines the former, ppc64le the latter. All other architectures
> do not have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE and include/linux/stacktrace.h
> defines -ENOSYS returning version for them.
> 
> In short, stack_trace_save_tsk_reliable() returning -ENOSYS defined in
> include/linux/stacktrace.h serves the same purpose as the old weak
> version of save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() which is therefore no longer
> needed.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

Best Regards,
Petr