Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:13:54 +0100
From:   Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To:     edubezval@gmail.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, javi.merino@kernel.org,
        viresh.kumar@linaro.org, amit.kachhap@gmail.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
        will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        ionela.voinescu@arm.com, mka@chromium.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Make IPA use PM_EM
Message-ID: <20190612091351.jet5sew5dnirsapz@queper01-lin>
References: <20190530092038.12020-1-quentin.perret@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190530092038.12020-1-quentin.perret@arm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Thursday 30 May 2019 at 10:20:35 (+0100), Quentin Perret wrote:
> Changes in v5:
> **************
>  - Changed patch 02 to guard IPA-specific code in cpu_cooling.c with
>    appropriate ifdefery (Daniel)
>  - Rebased on 5.2-rc2

Is there anything else I can do on this series ? Should I send a v6 with
Viresh's and Daniel's Acked-by ?

Many thanks,
Quentin