Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751171AbVKUW1j (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:27:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751179AbVKUW1j (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:27:39 -0500 Received: from mail.linspire.com ([130.94.123.204]:16611 "EHLO mail.lindows.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751171AbVKUW1i (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:27:38 -0500 Message-ID: <438249CB.8050200@linspire.com> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:27:23 -0800 From: David Fox User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20050922 Linspire/1.6-5.1.1.50.linspire0.2 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.6.15-rc2 pci_ids.h cleanup is a pain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 570 Lines: 11 I'm sure I'm not the only person that applies patches to the kernel that use some of the 500 plus PCI IDS eliminated from pci_ids.h by rc2. I would like to see the PCI ids that were removed simply because the don't occur in the main kernel source restored. Is there a rationale for removing them that I'm not aware of? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/