Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751121AbVKUWbG (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:31:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751179AbVKUWbG (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:31:06 -0500 Received: from adsl-67-120-171-161.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([67.120.171.161]:38291 "HELO linuxace.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751121AbVKUWbE (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:31:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:31:04 -0800 From: Phil Oester To: David Fox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc2 pci_ids.h cleanup is a pain Message-ID: <20051121223104.GA6881@linuxace.com> References: <438249CB.8050200@linspire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <438249CB.8050200@linspire.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 750 Lines: 16 On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:27:23PM -0800, David Fox wrote: > I'm sure I'm not the only person that applies patches to the kernel that > use some of the 500 plus PCI IDS eliminated from pci_ids.h by rc2. I > would like to see the PCI ids that were removed simply because the don't > occur in the main kernel source restored. Is there a rationale for > removing them that I'm not aware of? As long as you are patching the kernel, is there some reason you can't add back the PCI IDs you require? Phil - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/