Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp5751179ybi; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:53:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxERGwLKC6YDqTvrWH/FMzvg4PzCEt+L7UxcJZrLw4EIb1QnoZFo4AR93gRVzFQ2ZnMvgA9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:aa0d:: with SMTP id k13mr31498049pjq.53.1560351233846; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:53:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560351233; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VWYYsN+7ohONeMVc6I/WdwJkixOg9lhCADJmuKGP12P0Y02RpzRyBk8WhqCfgH0qt0 fHoDOmptAUqeczaMo32wc1Lc9CVWE4lKi0rV3L1Po6R/X0y5QqTZl+RE3BC0dQwSRvjn fiWnGcZArU0Rb/qszxdn8teR5qn0tCO7v0n+ClMKtLOI4pZTFFKoGV0dPBGWkcpk0BOS uqZA4LzvqO4a5CkL+5Bvh8BcNBFFp0FsC5duhXiALPeHuYB9gd7/Tzzsxiq9JSV+5+P3 cdnH8nujBGNAbzhLshJJOWO0XeC3IaIPjhrPYlVwpLw5Ym5WRSAxbbO9B37Z085Hc6Vq PSGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dmarc-filter:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=3hyVOeYe5C/6uHz1H75dvyp4Xi7RlQQeo3jwvfiMmO4=; b=ivgrr5lhqpUqR6Sy9LNH1x6ZzpZoZl5pQToRXPL6DLgzreIxUB4f3HV/RdkXnkBj1k +Ssd9JUNfFFvKZ9d48bmEAD6AFf3CpmZie9vugS/jSvZlYr9TRAFKpoD+xDROwQCJzca 1963XxvnUyW16/smOLV9rYriI75xt6zMk31Oufdq1D++vw2XVTmMVdQ1NLLxu+R2+vv9 mKjo5elwWfm+cHynf/DIdKp+XGFSDqQgIonAPTXNuaCj7ywCgmaY5idqgyEnsrV+lxHS Ygi4xKsblqyAWzA7mwxjet/OTqaA3Ls/Dx67MoS6rx19HJPw6qDkEkBawFid4dkKLJev bf2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=SncEUmuT; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=ofVm4CB8; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t21si74112pjq.62.2019.06.12.07.53.38; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=SncEUmuT; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=ofVm4CB8; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2438087AbfFLK5j (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:57:39 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:33786 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2406068AbfFLK5i (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:57:38 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07775602F4; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:57:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1560337058; bh=oOZ98tsfUcMb5kz541ac534SCL+FNkZhdSUmPX7BTHQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SncEUmuTFA95G0lWYfzvqn/+JhytL2ktHBm0/+nodNZXY9tlZ15KX8HcSspTJwuLN DaliTKyBRaGsqF829cBYRMOy5Y41JpzTXf6WGVBFVrUCa9jaVRxn8txiHSNTkqkXgI o1Kw30eCRgt0o5MmPsqJMSCwiicHnblbsks0c2xM= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mojha-linux.qualcomm.com (blr-c-bdr-fw-01_globalnat_allzones-outside.qualcomm.com [103.229.19.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mojha@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A52AA60254; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:57:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1560337056; bh=oOZ98tsfUcMb5kz541ac534SCL+FNkZhdSUmPX7BTHQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ofVm4CB8H3Sgcc3nJPNFUbDhidsBbx6NoJNicT53OttDsSqE1m6K3Tr63RnmroxUs 8RadmuexlwURofTdo5sDDv7sCGyPVkmYDApkLJJlNXFaSqfw29flvycOZ4nrbvsvjj MV8vh1ILnXNYXt5e6iRBsJCiu6d69foRuAs1Cm70= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org A52AA60254 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=mojha@codeaurora.org From: Mukesh Ojha To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mukesh Ojha , Raghavendra Rao Ananta , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Alexei Starovoitov Subject: [PATCH V3] perf: event preserve and create across cpu hotplug Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:27:25 +0530 Message-Id: <1560337045-13298-1-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1559309956-32534-2-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org> References: <1559309956-32534-2-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Perf framework doesn't allow preserving CPU events across CPU hotplugs. The events are scheduled out as and when the CPU walks offline. Moreover, the framework also doesn't allow the clients to create events on an offline CPU. As a result, the clients have to keep on monitoring the CPU state until it comes back online. Therefore, introducing the perf framework to support creation and preserving of (CPU) events for offline CPUs. Through this, the CPU's online state would be transparent to the client and it not have to worry about monitoring the CPU's state. Success would be returned to the client even while creating the event on an offline CPU. If during the lifetime of the event the CPU walks offline, the event would be preserved and would continue to count as soon as (and if) the CPU comes back online. Co-authored-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexei Starovoitov --- Change in V3: - Jiri has tried perf stat -a and removed one of the cpu from the other terminal. This resulted in a crash. Crash was because in event_function_call(), we were passing NULL as cpuctx in func(event, NULL, ctx, data).Fixed it in this patch. Change in V2: As per long back discussion happened at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/15/1324 Peter.Z. has suggested to do thing in different way and shared patch as well. This patch fixes the issue seen while trying to achieve the purpose. Fixed issue on top of Peter's patch: =================================== 1. Added a NULL check on task to avoid crash in __perf_install_in_context. 2. while trying to add event to context when cpu is offline. Inside add_event_to_ctx() to make consistent state machine while hotplug. -event->state += PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET; +event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET; 3. In event_function_call(), added a label 'remove_event_from_ctx' to delete events from context list while cpu is offline. include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 + kernel/events/core.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h index 3dc01cf..52b14b2 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -511,6 +511,7 @@ enum perf_event_state { PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF = -1, PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE = 0, PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE = 1, + PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET = -32, }; struct file; diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 118ad1a..7f0bd11 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static int event_function(void *info) static void event_function_call(struct perf_event *event, event_f func, void *data) { struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx; + struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx); struct task_struct *task = READ_ONCE(ctx->task); /* verified in event_function */ struct event_function_struct efs = { .event = event, @@ -264,17 +265,18 @@ static void event_function_call(struct perf_event *event, event_f func, void *da lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex); } - if (!task) { - cpu_function_call(event->cpu, event_function, &efs); - return; - } - if (task == TASK_TOMBSTONE) return; again: - if (!task_function_call(task, event_function, &efs)) - return; + if (task) { + if (!task_function_call(task, event_function, &efs)) + return; + } else { + if (!cpu_function_call(event->cpu, event_function, &efs)) + return; + } + raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock); /* @@ -286,11 +288,17 @@ static void event_function_call(struct perf_event *event, event_f func, void *da raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock); return; } + + if (!task) + goto remove_event_from_ctx; + if (ctx->is_active) { raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock); goto again; } - func(event, NULL, ctx, data); + +remove_event_from_ctx: + func(event, cpuctx, ctx, data); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock); } @@ -2310,7 +2318,7 @@ static void perf_set_shadow_time(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event *event, *partial_group = NULL; struct pmu *pmu = ctx->pmu; - if (group_event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) + if (group_event->state <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) return 0; pmu->start_txn(pmu, PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD); @@ -2389,6 +2397,14 @@ static int group_can_go_on(struct perf_event *event, static void add_event_to_ctx(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx) { + if (!ctx->task) { + struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = + container_of(ctx, struct perf_cpu_context, ctx); + + if (!cpuctx->online) + event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET; + } + list_add_event(event, ctx); perf_group_attach(event); } @@ -2576,11 +2592,6 @@ static int __perf_install_in_context(void *info) */ smp_store_release(&event->ctx, ctx); - if (!task) { - cpu_function_call(cpu, __perf_install_in_context, event); - return; - } - /* * Should not happen, we validate the ctx is still alive before calling. */ @@ -2619,8 +2630,14 @@ static int __perf_install_in_context(void *info) */ smp_mb(); again: - if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_install_in_context, event)) - return; + + if (task) { + if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_install_in_context, event)) + return; + } else { + if (!cpu_function_call(cpu, __perf_install_in_context, event)) + return; + } raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock); task = ctx->task; @@ -2637,7 +2654,7 @@ static int __perf_install_in_context(void *info) * If the task is not running, ctx->lock will avoid it becoming so, * thus we can safely install the event. */ - if (task_curr(task)) { + if (task && task_curr(task)) { raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock); goto again; } @@ -11022,16 +11039,7 @@ static int perf_event_set_clock(struct perf_event *event, clockid_t clk_id) } if (!task) { - /* - * Check if the @cpu we're creating an event for is online. - * - * We use the perf_cpu_context::ctx::mutex to serialize against - * the hotplug notifiers. See perf_event_{init,exit}_cpu(). - */ - struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = - container_of(ctx, struct perf_cpu_context, ctx); - - if (!cpuctx->online) { + if (!cpu_possible(cpu)) { err = -ENODEV; goto err_locked; } @@ -11213,15 +11221,7 @@ struct perf_event * } if (!task) { - /* - * Check if the @cpu we're creating an event for is online. - * - * We use the perf_cpu_context::ctx::mutex to serialize against - * the hotplug notifiers. See perf_event_{init,exit}_cpu(). - */ - struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = - container_of(ctx, struct perf_cpu_context, ctx); - if (!cpuctx->online) { + if (!cpu_possible(cpu)) { err = -ENODEV; goto err_unlock; } @@ -11949,17 +11949,48 @@ static void perf_swevent_init_cpu(unsigned int cpu) } #if defined CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU || defined CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE +static void __perf_event_init_cpu_context(void *__info) +{ + struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __info; + struct perf_event_context *ctx = &cpuctx->ctx; + struct perf_event_context *task_ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx; + struct perf_event *event; + + perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, task_ctx); + ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_ALL); + if (task_ctx) + ctx_sched_out(task_ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_ALL); + + list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) + perf_event_set_state(event, event->state - PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET); + + perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current); + perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, task_ctx); +} + +static void _perf_event_init_cpu_context(int cpu, struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx) +{ + smp_call_function_single(cpu, __perf_event_init_cpu_context, cpuctx, 1); +} + static void __perf_event_exit_context(void *__info) { - struct perf_event_context *ctx = __info; - struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx); + struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __info; + struct perf_event_context *ctx = &cpuctx->ctx; + struct perf_event_context *task_ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx; struct perf_event *event; - raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock); - ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME); - list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) - __perf_remove_from_context(event, cpuctx, ctx, (void *)DETACH_GROUP); - raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock); + perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, task_ctx); + ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_ALL); + if (task_ctx) + ctx_sched_out(task_ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_ALL); + + list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) + perf_event_set_state(event, + event->state + PERF_EVENT_STATE_HOTPLUG_OFFSET); + + perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current); + perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, task_ctx); } static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu) @@ -11974,7 +12005,7 @@ static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu) ctx = &cpuctx->ctx; mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex); - smp_call_function_single(cpu, __perf_event_exit_context, ctx, 1); + smp_call_function_single(cpu, __perf_event_exit_context, cpuctx, 1); cpuctx->online = 0; mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex); } @@ -11982,7 +12013,7 @@ static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu) mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock); } #else - +static void _perf_event_init_cpu_context(int cpu, struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx) { } static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu) { } #endif @@ -12003,6 +12034,7 @@ int perf_event_init_cpu(unsigned int cpu) mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex); cpuctx->online = 1; + _perf_event_init_cpu_context(cpu, cpuctx); mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex); } mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock); -- Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project