Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751226AbVKUWoy (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:44:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751216AbVKUWoy (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:44:54 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:63385 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751220AbVKUWox (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:44:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:44:38 -0800 From: Greg KH To: David Fox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc2 pci_ids.h cleanup is a pain Message-ID: <20051121224438.GA18966@kroah.com> References: <438249CB.8050200@linspire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <438249CB.8050200@linspire.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 842 Lines: 20 On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:27:23PM -0800, David Fox wrote: > I'm sure I'm not the only person that applies patches to the kernel that > use some of the 500 plus PCI IDS eliminated from pci_ids.h by rc2. I > would like to see the PCI ids that were removed simply because the don't > occur in the main kernel source restored. Is there a rationale for > removing them that I'm not aware of? They were not being used. Why would you want them in there? And, what pending patches do you have that patched this file? Is there a reason you have not submitted it for inclusion? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/