Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 6/7] i2c: tegra: fix PIO rx/tx residual transfer check
To:     Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@nvidia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc:     Shardar Mohammed <smohammed@nvidia.com>,
        Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>,
        Mantravadi Karthik <mkarthik@nvidia.com>
References: <1560250274-18499-1-git-send-email-bbiswas@nvidia.com>
 <1560250274-18499-6-git-send-email-bbiswas@nvidia.com>
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <42ce2523-dab9-0cdf-e8ff-42631dd161b7@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:30:15 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1560250274-18499-6-git-send-email-bbiswas@nvidia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

11.06.2019 13:51, Bitan Biswas пишет:
> Fix expression for residual bytes(less than word) transfer
> in I2C PIO mode RX/TX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@nvidia.com>
> ---

[snip]

>  		/*
> -		 * Update state before writing to FIFO.  If this casues us
> +		 * Update state before writing to FIFO.  If this causes us
>  		 * to finish writing all bytes (AKA buf_remaining goes to 0) we
>  		 * have a potential for an interrupt (PACKET_XFER_COMPLETE is
> -		 * not maskable).  We need to make sure that the isr sees
> -		 * buf_remaining as 0 and doesn't call us back re-entrantly.
> +		 * not maskable).
>  		 */
>  		buf_remaining -= words_to_transfer * BYTES_PER_FIFO_WORD;

Looks like the comment could be removed altogether because it doesn't
make sense since interrupt handler is under xfer_lock which is kept
locked during of tegra_i2c_xfer_msg().

Moreover the comment says that "PACKET_XFER_COMPLETE is not maskable",
but then what I2C_INT_PACKET_XFER_COMPLETE masking does?