Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp5939519ybi; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:03:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxNwGmyvu+hb9XXZB02ERklaHCBQNsRm34BvdIjG1Ty9kl1081hPojvhzh2+hp1n7BFVf6s X-Received: by 2002:a63:6841:: with SMTP id d62mr25868847pgc.17.1560362632206; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:03:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560362632; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kluWP+qzeFzvw+Ch6QT3ZX2XhxK//UPwmy/HtZ00irUIIh/j/u+WAI8dRD5ZmfsfjH mpMP0ADsRnd6wJ4MquY2V/Od4dx+KHJjuYaLLoKci3LnjmtQpWmrwI/bBQAMGT5ps4oX rx5d4J/2M9N3XmvfPNqG4r1Qf6tqDO0nRptJceVKdQapFldQFmo2oRx0UOp6WJETOJI8 W+gvt3i51fUjLUZFOwUw7ZPxhxGOLm2GXVXFO5jaGc3Sggfady4z6g4Db7vtG/CnynBq pdN0zwb0jeFHwBS/H5aAU0oWUK6l60fUNIp0vThxEkkTRVT50wQKRkaRvg4s0cnBM3gU F+8g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=ZDj2EFFCcFxvxWi3z9QdjlSsD28qt3civ77Vp6JQWtk=; b=hX6XyJF5t3hqU2HEOFxx+1mhYVn05DWXNCT6X7COAvHVdgUl40S2TJW0SZ1U8cwP5S pvJle3amov1FxaYUEVuF797/mwsg/Ln9lAywuXQTzD7pbf1o8ziiwsGMB+UZL9Uh+WCY PRpLJaswEDmks8eJo6DOnuoM4oZSijFB0R5xNJUljD55kPnY9TX3vcp+u39aDdz7am3l Uiobuu1zKK8GG5guhXSnvWGlWBTEtf9hQ8V2zHSDupceuTuR67qgS/TVc2VgRCBuJard SBqSLjOUFwVvwJFjziEf7oS7jP5+hRhJw29G9aU877C+UIH+2iSLcDF6NMyMxMN8OrMh Fsgg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b1si437631pjb.92.2019.06.12.11.03.37; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2501874AbfFLPNh (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:13:37 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:55532 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2437534AbfFLPNg (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:13:36 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1ED337; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redmoon (unknown [10.1.196.255]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBD033F557; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:13:31 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: "Z.q. Hou" Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "l.subrahmanya@mobiveil.co.in" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , Leo Li , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , Mingkai Hu , "M.h. Lian" , Xiaowei Bao Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 07/20] PCI: mobiveil: Use WIN_NUM_0 explicitly for CFG outbound window Message-ID: <20190612151331.GE15747@redmoon> References: <20190412083635.33626-1-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> <20190412083635.33626-8-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190412083635.33626-8-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 08:35:54AM +0000, Z.q. Hou wrote: > From: Hou Zhiqiang > > As the .map_bus() use the WIN_NUM_0 for CFG transactions, > it's better passing WIN_NUM_0 explicitly when initialize > the CFG outbound window. > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang > Reviewed-by: Minghuan Lian > Reviewed-by: Subrahmanya Lingappa > --- > V5: > - Corrected the subject. > > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c > index b2cc9c097fc9..df71c11b4810 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c > @@ -612,9 +612,8 @@ static int mobiveil_host_init(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie) > */ > > /* config outbound translation window */ > - program_ob_windows(pcie, pcie->ob_wins_configured, > - pcie->ob_io_res->start, 0, CFG_WINDOW_TYPE, > - resource_size(pcie->ob_io_res)); > + program_ob_windows(pcie, WIN_NUM_0, pcie->ob_io_res->start, 0, > + CFG_WINDOW_TYPE, resource_size(pcie->ob_io_res)); This makes sense - current code is quite obscure and prone to bugs. Lorenzo > /* memory inbound translation window */ > program_ib_windows(pcie, WIN_NUM_1, 0, MEM_WINDOW_TYPE, IB_WIN_SIZE); > -- > 2.17.1 >